Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Environmental outputs of each ecosystem restoration alternative will be determined <br />utilizing the assessment methodology used in determining the without project condition <br />in step 2 above, The biologist will then assist in showing through cost effective analysis <br />that an alternative restoration plan's outputs cannot be produced more cost-effectively <br />by another alternative, The biologist will meet with the sponsor and interested agencies <br />during the determination of outputs, <br /> <br />Statements of significance of ecosystem outputs will be prepared for alternative plans in <br />order to provide qualitative information to help decision makers evaluate alternatives, <br />The environmental impacts of each flood damage reduction alternative will also be <br />determined. <br /> <br />5,0 NEPA / Environmental Documentation <br /> <br />In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act and implementing regulations, <br />preparation of an EA will be necessary, A detailed assessment will be written that <br />identifies environmental impacts, beneficial and adverse, of the proposed action. Based <br />on the identified impacts and concerns, reasonable alternatives to the proposed action <br />would be developed, The EA will be integrated into the feasibility report. A Draft <br />Feasibility ReporUEA will be circulated for public review and comment before a Final <br />Feasibility ReporUEA is prepared, <br /> <br />In accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the FWS and the Colorado <br />Division of Wildlife will be requested to identify fish and wildlife concerns and available <br />information and provide their views concerning the significance of fish and wildlife <br />resources, Depending on the significance of issues at hand, a coordination act report <br />may be necessary. The coordination act report would provide information that would <br />allow consideration of the conservation of wildlife resources with the view of preventing <br />loss of and damages to such resources as well as providing for development and <br />improvement in connection with water resources development. Full consideration must <br />be given to reports and recommendations furnished. The Corps is to provide funding to <br />the FWS for their activities pursuant to this law. <br /> <br />In accordance with the Endangered Species Act, the FWS will be requested to provide <br />information on any federally listed threatened or endangered species, in the project <br />area, that may potentially be affected by the implementation of the proposed project. It <br />is anticipated that the preparation of a biological assessment will be necessary as well, <br />The biological assessment will evaluate the effects of the proposal on federally listed <br />threatened or endangered species that may exist in the area, The biological <br />assessment will for the most part be an extraction of text from the EA. Special studies <br />may be needed to determine the actual presence or absence of listed species, <br /> <br />I n accordance with the Clean Water Act, preparation of a 404(b) (1) ecological <br />evaluation is anticipated to be necessary, This evaluation will determine the potential <br />effects of any proposed discharges of fill material of any alternatives on the physical, <br />chemical, and biological components of the waters of the US, including wetlands. <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />