FLOOD07306

• County: Weld
• Community: Greeley
• Stream Name: Cache La Poudre River
• Basin: South Platte
• Title: Cache La Poudre River General Investigation Study, Greeley, CO
• Date: 5/1/2005
• Prepared For: Greeley
• Prepared By: USACE, Omaha, NE
• Floodplain - Doc Type: Project

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2. WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

2.1 General

The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a breakdown of the project into its component
work tasks and products, Table 3 presents the DRAFT work breakdowns structure for the
work effort leading up to Decision Point I, Table 4 presents the DRAFT work
breakdown structure for the entire Feasibility Study, It should be noted that neither the
final cost, nor the in-kind services have been negotiated with the city of Greeley. The
detailed WBS for this project, and the scopes of work for each technical discipline, are
provided in the Appendix, Decision Point I is reached by conducting the first three steps
of the planning process in this feasibility study, This effort includes the specification of
problems and opportunities, inventorying and forecasting future conditions and the
formulation of alternative plans. A separate cost estirnate has been prepared for that
initial effort.

2.2 In-Kind Services

The Sponsor may contribute up to 50 percent of the Study Costs through the provision of
In,Kind Services (IKS), subject to applicable laws and as negotiated as part of the cost
share agreement. The IKS to be provided by the Sponsor, the estimated negotiated costs
for those services and the estimated schedule under which those services are to be
provided will be specified in the PMP established for the Cost,Shared Feasibility phase,
Negotiated costs shall be subject to an audit by the Government to determine
reasonableness and allowability, The local Sponsor shall provide documentation of the
method by which the In-Kind Services were computed,

In previous discussions between the Corps and the City of Greeley, IKS have been
discussed, but not quantified, In those discussions, it was determined that likely
candidates for Sponsor work included GIS products, project management services
including Product Delivery Team participation such as travel to meetings, real estate and
utilities efforts, land valuation and economic data, documentation of previous flood
stages and other services that City officials can provide that improves the accuracy of the
feasibility study, More details on possible areas that can be credited as In,Kind Services,
and their impact on the total study cost, are provided in the PMP Appendix. The IKS
have been estimated for negotiation purposes. Prior to the signing of the FCSA, In-Kind
Services will need to be evaluated by the Sponsor, The Sponsor's evaluation should
include an estimation of labor hours, hourly rates burdened with overhead, and the value
of travel, materials, supplies and technical products developed during the cosHhared
feasibility phase (such as GIS files).

2.3 Work Breakdown Structure by Phase

The work breakdown structure and cost estimate is presented by phase and by work
discipline in Tables I and 2 as follows. Table I presents the anticipated costs to reach
Decision Point I and Table 2 presents the anticipated costs for the entire study.

10