My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07213
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:24 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:48:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
85
County
Adams
Arapahoe
Douglas
Community
Denver Metro Region
Stream Name
Weir Gulch Tributaries
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Hazard Area Delineation - Weir Gulch Tributaries, 1st Avenue and Dakota Avenue - Lakewood and Denver, CO
Date
7/1/1977
Designation Date
11/1/1977
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />FLOOD HISTORY <br /> <br />"2. The most upstream report of high water cal'1e from a resident at <br />6200 Nevada Place. This person said water had flowed as high <br />as the sidewalk on both sides of the street. <br /> <br />4. Immediately upstream of So. Eaton St. the flood channel is ter- <br />minated and a 42-inch diameter pipe is orovided for conveyance <br />(see sheet 7). The inlet of this pipe was free of debris, but <br />the City of Lakewood was in the area that morning and could have <br />cleaned the inlet. Evidence of hioh water on fences across Sa. <br />Eaton St. was as high as 1.5 feet." The lady livinq north of the <br />drainageway an So. Eaton St. showed where her vegetable garden <br />nad washed away. She experienced no other property damage. <br /> <br />7. Deposits of sediment and debris showed where water left the banks of <br />the channel between secti ons 26 + 00 and 20 + 40 on sheet 8." <br /> <br />Flood history on record for the two tributaries is limited to occasional <br /> <br />complaints filed by telephone with the City of Denver. Centennial Engineerir;, <br /> <br />Inc., staff conducted interviews with residents in areas where calculations <br /> <br />indicated a potential flooding problem exists. <br /> <br />Along the 1st Avenue Tributary, no specific problems were reported for the a'~a <br /> <br />west of Sheridan Boulevard. The lower lying areas east of Sheridan Boulevarc <br />seem to be subject to flooding on a more frequent than annual basis. Resi- <br />dents reported having water in their yards and basements during or after any <br />heavy rainstorm and complained about "sewage-like odors" coming from the oper <br />channel portion located close to the mouth of the tributary. The lack of <br />maintenance on these channels is the apparent reason for the growth in the <br />channel to generate enough resistance to cause overtopping even at low-intensity <br /> <br />Flood experience seems less frequent and not as severe as on 1st Avenue Tributary. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGY <br /> <br />The two tributaries were each divided into subbasins. The Colorado Urban <br /> <br />Hydrograph Procedure was used to develop peak discharges at the design point <br /> <br /> <br />of each subbasin for the 5, 10, 50, and 100-year recurrence intervals for <br /> <br />storms. <br /> <br />future dAvelopment conditions. <br /> <br />Along the Dakota Avenue Tributary, flooded basements were not reported. Residents <br />on Eaton Street observed that "once in awhile" flow overtops the roadway. <br />Ponding was observed east of Depew Street, but no specific dates could be <br />remembered. At Sheridan Boulevard and east of Sheridan Boulevard, it was <br /> <br />Rainfall Data <br /> <br />The rainfall intensity was assumed to be the same over the entire drainage <br /> <br /> <br />basin for a three-hour duration. The values listed below for rainfall depth <br /> <br /> <br />are taken from project "REUSE" for Jefferson County, T4S" R69W, and were used <br /> <br /> <br />for both drainage basins. <br /> <br />observed that water flowing down Alaska Place would run across Yates Street <br /> <br /> <br />through the yards down to Xavier Street. A recent storm (June 6, 1977) provided <br /> <br /> <br />evidence of flood problems in the area. Residents reported 30 to 60 minutes <br /> <br /> <br />of heavy rain, and an inspection was made on the afternoon of June 7, 1977. <br /> <br /> <br />Following are excerpts from the inspection memorandum2 which illustrates <br /> <br /> <br />typical flood problems. <br /> <br />TABLE 1 <br />RAINFALL DATA <br /> <br />Depth (Inches) <br /> <br />Frequency 1 hour 6 hours <br />2- Year .68 1.12 <br />10-Year 1.50 2.50 <br />50-Year 1.83 3.16 <br />100-Year 2.00 3.50 <br /> <br />Losses <br /> <br />Based on the recommendations given in the "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria <br /> <br />~1anual", the following criteria for losses were applied to calculate the run- <br /> <br />2File memorandum by Jon Sorenson, L. Rice Consulting Water Engineers, dated <br />June 8,1977, Job No. 41.01. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.