Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Hydrologic Engineering Center in Davis, California, and has been accep- <br />ted as one of the most thorough and comprehensive methodologies for cal- <br />culating water surface profiles in natural and urban channels. This <br />program has been used in other drainage studies in the Denver Metropoli- <br />tan Area for the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Criteria <br /> <br />The flows used for the water surface computations were obtained from the <br /> <br /> <br />unit hydrographs and discharge probabi lity curves developed in the hydro- <br /> <br /> <br />logic investigation. The flood routing program was applied to Sloans <br /> <br /> <br />Lake from which water surface elevations for the various design flood <br /> <br /> <br />frequencies were developed. The computed water surface elevations were <br /> <br />plotted on the 1"=100' scale mapping from which flood plains for the <br /> <br /> <br />5-, 10-, 25- and 100-year design floods were drawn. Only the 100-year <br /> <br /> <br />flood plain is shown in this report. <br /> <br />In the evaluation of Sloans Lake Basin, 190 drainageway sections were <br />taken from the 1"-100' scale mapping completed for the project. Input <br />to the HEC-2 water surface profile program included the drainageway <br />flows, cross section data along the drainageways, control data of drain- <br />age structures and obstructions such as buildings, vegetation, and man- <br />made embankments, and channel roughness coefficients. The Mannings <br />roughness factors used In the computat ion of water surface profi les <br />varied from 0.013 to 0.10 In the drainageways and 0.015 to 0.10 in the <br />overbank areas. Transition coefficients used to denote changes In the <br />channel cross sectton causing energy losses varied from 0.3 to 0.9 <br />for expansion and O. I to 0.5 for contraction. All coefficients were <br />based on field observatIon of each dralnageway within the Basin. <br /> <br />Analysis <br /> <br />Flood profiles were run on each of the drainageways within the Basin. <br />the 5-, 10-, 25- and 100-year flood profi les were calculated for the <br />totally developed basin utilizing peak flows developed in the hydro- <br />logic investigation. The I imits of the computed flood plain for the <br />100-year event is presented on the drawings contained In this re- <br />port. From the 1"=100' plotted flood plain information, an analysis <br />of potential flood plain damages was made. <br /> <br />Structures along the channel were analyzed concurrently with the drain- <br />agewayevaluatlon. Street crossing structure capacities were computed <br />along with rating curves for significant crossings using the HEC-2 <br />Water Surface Profiles Computer Program. Particular examination was <br />made of culverts under Sheridan Boulevard leading to Sloans Lake where a <br />change in the lake's water surface elevation had a distinct effect on <br />the culvert capacity, as well as the backwater flood elevation. <br /> <br />Both the Basin hydrologic investigation and the flood plain delinea- <br />tion analysis identified numerous potential problem areas for damage <br />to existing development. The location by drainage reach, defined as <br />the length of drainageway between design points, of some of the major <br />potential problem areas are I isted as follows: <br /> <br />Ora i nageway <br />Reach <br /> <br />Potential Flood Damage Problem Areas <br /> <br />A-B <br /> <br />Flood water diversion from lower Co[fax Avenue between <br />Federal Boulevard and the South Platte River (Sub-basin <br />A) into the adjacent direct flow sub-basin (A4) on <br />streets located under the Colfax viaduct. <br /> <br />10 <br />