Laserfiche WebLink
<br />./ <br /> <br />I..:./~-i' -- I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br /> <br />~.. r. r r ci r.: : , <br />I :' I," I: \ " '.' <br />" ,'nR' ;.-~~- <br />-~..,', ~~ .~.!t-(f.~:'fi"- <br />,',"" , _.*,,___",..~~~:f;J'~. "Cf."'. ~ "";'>' 'QP'.: ~" . <br />~i' ~,-..;:: ,,' #';'''''':::':'''~:;-C'.'''h-''-'''-''''''~' "'" ,''','' ~( <br />~.' '... ,~"r .~~~ . -"""',:f..:.~ ;,\ -~--,~~--......... <br />-- " <br /> <br />March 17, 1988 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Mr. J. William McDonald, Director <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management Section <br />Colorado Water Conservation board <br />721 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Stree't <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. McDonald: <br /> <br />e; <br /> <br />Per your "Rules and Regulations for the Designation and <br />Approval of Floodplains and of Storm or Floodwater Runoff Channels <br />in Colorado" dated December 11, 1987, an entity requesting a new <br />Designation or a revised designation of a floodplain must submit <br />their request in writing to the. Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />at least 30 days prior to the next Board meeting. Rules 9 (D)(1) <br />and 10 clearly state this requ~rement. However, Rule 11 allows an <br />entity to request a variance for any part of Rules 1 through 10. <br />Therefore, the City of Westmin~ter is requesting a ~ariance for <br />Rules 9 (D)(l) and 10 with res~ect to the 30 day ad~ance notice. <br /> <br />The primary reason that tne City is requesting this variance <br />is because we are trying to aC~ommodate the existing property <br />owners and allow them the flexibility of selling or developing <br />their land. It should also be pointed out that this variance does <br />not impact any structures and that all technical criteria used to <br />establish the revised floodplain elevations and designations are <br />in strict.: compliance with all C,ther a.spects of Rule::: 9 and 10. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />On Monday, March 14, 1988, the City delivered a copy of the <br />Report that was prepared for a portion of Big Dry Creek within the <br />City of Westminster just downstream of Standley Lake to the <br />Colorado Water Conservation BOard. This Report, as prepared by <br />Wright Water Engineering, Inc., is a more detailed investigation <br />of the 100-year floodplain of that portion of Big Dry Creek just <br />upstream of the Colorado Southern Railroad. It takes into account <br />the routing and storage capabilities upstream of the railroad <br />within the adopted 1986 Flood ~azard Area Deli~aation (FHAD) <br />Floodway. The criteria and techniques utilized in the analysis <br />are acceptable to both the City of Westminster and the Urban <br /> <br />~800 We5~ Nln€-ry.S€.:cnd A'.'IE'rIU':?- .. 80:)3:'.' ~.3;::2:i .~::;C'-7..:;(;:' <br />