Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />8 City of Littleton <br /> <br />~ <br />< <br />~ ~~ <br />@ R:~ <br /> <br />Massey Draw and SJCD (South) Major Orainageway Planning Update <br />Conceptual Design Report <br />February 2006 <br /> <br />4.0 Hydraulic Analysis <br /> <br />5. Massey Draw and SJCD (South) flow into Chatfield Reservoir and South Platte Park, <br />respectively. Design for a pilot project to correct bank erosion problems and to reduce the <br />phosphorus loading of the reservoir was recently completed. The project design includes bank <br />stabilization, drop structures, and wetlands and habitat improvements. The City of Littleton is <br />concerned about the sediment load and water quality that is discharged into the lakes within <br />South Platte Park. Although the PMF channel that will be constructed as part of the South <br />Platte Reservoir includes a sediment basin and an extended detention basin, additional <br />measures may be warranted to enhance the water quality in SJCD (South). <br />6. During a flash flood event June 27. 2004, a flow split occurred on the Deer Creek Golf Course <br />west of West Rockland Drive that directed flow to the north side of West Rockland Drive. <br />South Oak Street and West Rockland Drive were overtopped and several structures were <br />flooded along <br />7. West Rockland Drive. Drainage studies and plans for this area of Meadow Ranch did not show <br />the flow split. The culverts under West Rockland Drive and South Oak Street were not <br />designed to accommodate the increased flows. <br />8. As part of this project, wetland mapping and threatened and endangered species habitat <br />assessment were performed by ERO Resources Corp. The report and figures are included in <br />Appendix F. Wetland and riparian area along the drainageway corridors include wetlands <br />ranging from wide cattail marshes to small patches along concrete trickle channels, Both <br />Massey Draw and SJCD (South) and their associated wetlands appear to be waters of the <br />United States and would be regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Potential habitat <br />for three federally listed species, Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse, Ute ladies' Tresses <br />Orchid, and Colorado Butterfly Plant, may occur within the study area. Prior to construction or <br />other activities, appropriately timed surveys for these species must be conducted. <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />4.1 Evaluation of Existing Facilities <br /> <br />A hydraulic analysis was performed to estimate the capacity of the existing drainageways and <br />structures, water surface elevations and to identify flooding problems. The project mapping was used <br />in the analysis and was supplemented by field investigations, the drainage structure inventory, and <br />available construction drawings and reports. <br /> <br />The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS (version 3.1.3, Reference 11) River Analysis System <br />program and HEC-GeoRAS (version 3.1.1, Reference 12) were used for the analysis. Geometric data <br />forthe HEC-RAS model was obtained using HEC-GeoRAS and a digital elevation model (DEM) that <br />was generated using the project mapping, This data included the cross sections, river stations, and <br />channel and overbank lengths. The HEC-GeoRAS data was imported into the HEC-RAS model. The <br />boundary conditions, culvert data and flows were then added, and the models were run for the <br />necessary storm events. <br /> <br />The flow rates from the baseline hydrology model were used in the hydraulic analysis. These flow <br />rates are presented in Table A-5. <br /> <br />The drainage structure inventory was used to obtain the culvert data needed for the models, The <br />culvert at C-470 and West Ken Caryl Avenue was determined to have a slope-tapered inlet. Due to <br />the flow in the stream and the configuration of the culvert inlet, field measurement was not possible. <br />Construction plans were obtained from CDOT to obtain the dimensions and elevations needed for the <br />model, <br /> <br />The model results were used to identify culvert overtopping. The 100-year profile was exported from <br />HEC-RAS to HEC-GeoRAS to produce floodplain maps and identify flooding problems. <br /> <br />The results of the hydraulic analysis and field observations are summarized in Table B-1 in Appendix <br />B. The existing culvert sizes are shown on Figure B-1, also in AppendiX B. <br /> <br />Massev Draw <br /> <br />4,2 Flood Hazards <br /> <br />Based on the hydraulic analysis, field observations and input from the Project sponsors, the following <br />flood hazards were identified: <br /> <br />Reach 1 - Chatfield Reservoir to C-470: This reach is in Chatfield State Park on land owned by the <br />U,S. Army Corps of Engineers. Downstream of the park access road, the channel slope is <br />approximately 0.4 percent. There is extensive vegetation and the channel appears to be stable. <br />Between the park access road and C-470, the channel slope is approximately 1.4 percent. The <br />channel meanders immediately downstream of C-470, There are vertical banks along this reach up to <br />6 feet high. Massey Draw crosses under the park access road in three 7-feet diameter reinforced <br />concrete pipe culverts, The road is overtopped by 1.9 feet during the 100-year event. It is estimated <br />to overtop between the 25- and 50-year storm events. <br /> <br />Reach 2 - C-470 to Wadsworth: This reach is in Chatfield State Park and is the site for the Massey <br />Draw Watershed and Ecosystem Improvement Pilot project. Improvements were designed to stabilize <br />the channel along this reach. Construction was completed in 2005. <br /> <br />Reach 3 - Wadsworth to Carr: Massey Draw crosses private property between Wadsworth and Carr, <br />Along the north bank, the houses were constructed close to the drainageway. On the south bank, at <br />the east end, the houses are 100 to 200 feet from the center of the drainageway, At the west end, the <br />houses are about 100 feet apart, with the drainageway passing between them. The average slope <br />along this reach is 1.4 percent. There are vertical banks up to 6 feet high, There is an existing vertical <br />rock drop structure, approximately 2.5 feet high, midway between Zephyr and Allison Streets. In 1999, <br /> <br />1. Channel slopes vary from 0.7 to 2.4 percent. These steep channels have resulted in high <br />velocities, lateral and vertical instability. UDFCD recommends slopes of approximately 0.4 to <br />0.5 percent in the study area to achieve stable channels, <br />2. In many areas, the floodplain width has been reduced by encroaching development, resulting in <br />higher flow depths. <br />3, Flood hazards in the study area include structure flooding and culvert overtopping, Jefferson <br />County criteria do not allow culvert overtopping during the 5-year storm, Twelve inches of <br />overtopping is allowed during the 1 OO-year event on local and collector streets. On arterial <br />streets, a minimum clearance of 6 inches to 2 feet between the energy grade line and the <br />culvert crown is required during the 1 OO-year event. <br />4, Although in many areas the drainageways flow through parks/tracts owned by the Foothills <br />Park and Recreation District or homeowners associations, there are several reaches that flow <br />through private property. Along these reaches there are no drainage easements or tracts <br />dedicated for drainage maintenance, drainage improvements, or floodplain preservation. In <br />some areas, development has encroached into the floodplain. <br /> <br />0\ <br /> <br />4-1 <br />