Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />& City of Littleton <br /> <br />~ <br />," <br />~ ~ <br />, . . <br /> <br /><:'0 R"~O <br /> <br />Massey Draw and SJCD (Southl Major Drainageway Planning Update <br />Conceptual Design Report <br />February 2006 <br /> <br />The 1 OO-year modified baseline model flows are included in Table 5. The effect of the existing <br />detention on Massey Draw is insignificant. The detention on SJCD (South) reduces the 1 OO-year flows <br />9 percent to 21 percent, with the most significant decrease immediately downstream of the detention, <br /> <br />Table A.5 in Appendix A presents modified baseline peak flows for all of the UDSWM conveyance <br />elements in the Massey Draw and SJCD (South) models for the 2-, S-, 10-,25-, SO-, 100-, and SOo- <br />year storm events. <br /> <br />Figures A-10 through A-12 in Appendix A show modified baseline model hydrographs generated by <br />UDSWM for the 1 OO-year storm at select locations for Massey Draw, SJCD (South), and their <br />tributaries. <br /> <br />Figure A-13 shows the modified baseline model peak flow versus location (station) for the main <br />Massey Draw channel and the North Tributary of Massey Draw for the 2-,10-,25-,50- and 100-year <br />storm events, In the graph of the main channel, the upstream reach of Massey Draw was considered <br />to be conveyance element 237, just west of the hogback. This point is downstream of two detention <br />basins and the confluence of several tributaries that convey drainage from the upper portion of the <br />watershed, <br /> <br />Figure A-14 shows the peak flow versus station for the main channel, North Tributary, and Tributary <br />Nos. 1 and 2 of SJCD (South). <br /> <br />0\ <br /> <br />3-3 <br />