My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06925
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:22 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:36:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Greeley
Stream Name
Cache La Poudre River
Basin
South Platte
Title
Master Floodway Planning
Date
3/11/1983
Prepared For
Greeley
Prepared By
Simons Li & Associates Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~_I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />f. <br /> <br />To provide all technical information required for the City to <br />reenter the National Flood Insurance Program and to ammend the <br />floodplain map issued by FEMA, if necessary. <br /> <br />2. Study Area <br /> <br />The study area is located in the northeastern section of the City of <br /> <br /> <br />Greeley including approximately 2.5 miles of the Cache La Poudre River. The <br /> <br /> <br />floodplain within the study reach is heavily developed with commercial, resi- <br /> <br />dentia11 and industrial structures present in the floodplain and floodway. <br /> <br /> <br />The channel is crossed by eight bridges in the study area. The lOa-year flood <br /> <br /> <br />discharges range from 8,000 cfs to 10,000 cfs in the study reach. The <br /> <br /> <br />floodplain is wide and generally shallow through the study reach. The City <br /> <br /> <br />has been required to dredge the channel about every other year indicating the <br /> <br /> <br />stream bed undergoes aggradation because of the mild slope (0.14 percent) and <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />wide cross section. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Scope of Work <br /> <br />We have carefully reviewed the project tasks presented in the RFP. We <br /> <br /> <br />have also discussed the intent of the project with Mr. Sam Sasaki of the City <br /> <br /> <br />and Mr. Larry Lang of CWCB. Our understanding of the scope of work for this <br /> <br /> <br />project includes: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />a. <br /> <br />Conduct a field visit to familiarize ourselves with the physi- <br />cal environment of the study area. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Collect and review all existing information pretinent to the <br />proposed project. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Conduct field investigation to collect all pertinent data <br />needed for hydraulic computation and floodplain and channel <br />conditions that may affect the formulation of improvement <br />plans. <br /> <br />d. <br /> <br />Reprogram the COE's data into the HEC-2 program and match the <br />HEC-2 results with the 1974 COE report and 1979 FEMA report <br />within acceptable range utilizing the flood discharges <br />developed by the COE. <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br />Perform hydraulic analysis using HEC-2 to determine a most <br />practical floodway plan using the FEMA one-foot rise criteria. <br /> <br />f. <br /> <br />Formulate a minimum of three alternative preliminary improve- <br />ment plans considering practical floodway, sedimentation, flow <br />blockage, channel stability, and maintenance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.