Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />sections. This will allow trade-offs between the City and property OWners to <br /> <br /> <br />maximize the developable area. <br /> <br /> <br />During the floodway analysis, close coordination will be required. The <br /> <br /> <br />best way to establish a floodway acceptable to the City is to start with <br /> <br /> <br />Method 4 to establish an equal encroachment floodway that meets the FEMA cri- <br /> <br /> <br />teria. At this stage, the City can express its desires and sketch a practical <br /> <br /> <br />floodway to meet floodplain management and implementation goals. Other <br /> <br /> <br />methods will be used to establish a floodway that meets the FEMA criteria and <br /> <br /> <br />is as close to the desired floodway as possible. Again, a trial an error pro- <br /> <br /> <br />cess will be used in order to establish a floodway acceptable to the City. <br /> <br /> <br />The recommended floodway will be delineated on a set of administrative mylar <br /> <br /> <br />maps at a scale of 1" = 100'. The administrative maps will also label the <br /> <br /> <br />streets, roadways, and update other identifiable features. <br /> <br /> <br />All references to previous information, documentation of hydraulic <br /> <br /> <br />variables used, bridge calculations, HEC-2 output, and all other information <br /> <br /> <br />will be fully documented in a technical addendum to allow future reproduction <br /> <br /> <br />of the results. <br /> <br />E. Improvement Plan Formulation and EValuation <br /> <br /> <br />Alternative plans of improvement will be formulated to alleviate flooding <br /> <br /> <br />problems in the study area. Plans will be formulated such that economical, <br /> <br /> <br />yet effective, solutions can be made. Improvement plans to be considered will <br /> <br /> <br />include channelization, levees, increased capacities at road crossings, <br /> <br /> <br />nonstructural methods such as floodplain regulation, flood insurance, or adop- <br /> <br /> <br />tion of a floodway, and combinations of improvement measures. <br /> <br /> <br />As indicated in the RFP, the study reach has sedimentation problems. The <br /> <br /> <br />City has been required to dredge the channel about every other year. SLA has <br /> <br /> <br />proposed to perform a qualitative assessment of the stability of the existing <br /> <br /> <br />channel and collect bed and bank material samples for determining sediment <br /> <br /> <br />sample distributions during the field investigation. Based on the results of <br /> <br /> <br />the hydraulic analysis and the sediment distribution, SLA proposes to perform <br /> <br /> <br />a geomorphic analysis to determine the most stable channel cross section and <br /> <br /> <br />slope. At this time, channelization seems to be an attractive alternative <br /> <br /> <br />because (1) channelization will have a narrow floodway and possibly more deve- <br /> <br /> <br />lopable land, (2) narrow and deep cross sections will provide a higher flow <br />