Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.; <br /> <br />-~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Mr. Dennis Maroney <br />March 5, 1998 <br />Page two <br /> <br />over Fountain Creek; 2) the extension of the existing Dillon Drive frontage road from the <br />Pueblo Mall north to State Highway 47 and then further north to the existing northern <br />part of Dillon Drive; 3) the construction of an access road between North Drive and <br />eastbound State Highway 47; 4) the construction of the new 40th Street Detention Basin to <br />reduce flows from an unnamed west bank tributary to Fountain Creek near State Highway <br />47; and 5) the reconfiguration of the Dillon Drive frontage road south of the Pueblo Mall, <br />to the new intersection with 29th Street and the Construction of a southerly extension of <br />Dillon Drive south of 29th Street. In addition, the project would provide a new <br />combination storm sewer/wetland channel system to convey flows from the unnamed <br />west bank tributary near State Highway 47 from the west side of 1-25 southeast to <br />Fountain Creek. <br /> <br />There are some localized changes to the floodplain as a result of individual project <br />features. In an overall sense, however, the post-project floodplain map does not look <br />significantly different from the pre-project map. There will be some discussion in the <br />remainder of this letter of some of the localized changes, but we do not have any major <br />objections to the concept that has been developed. <br /> <br />Revisions to the Pre-Proiect Floodolain Mao <br />There are substantial differences between the CH2M HILL 1997 pre-project flood <br />elevations and the 1986 FIS flood elevations. For much of the study stream reach the <br />1997 elevations are from 0 to 3 feet higher than the FIS elevations, when comoared on <br />the same datum. When the two different survey data are used without adjustment, there <br />is an elevation difference of 3 to 6 feet. For the upstream 1500 feet or so the 1997 <br />elevations are much closer to the FIS elevations, ranging from approximately 2 feet <br />higher to 0.5 foot lower than the 1986 elevations. <br /> <br />Three reasons for these changes in flood elevations were given. The first reason has <br />already been mentioned, the change in datum. Changing from NGVD '29 to NA VD '88 <br />means an adjustment of 2.8 feet in flood elevations. The second reason was that there <br />were significant changes in channel geometry between 1986 and 1997. Since the changes <br />were almost all increases, it is presumed that there is an ongoing process of channel <br />aggradation (deposition) in this reach of Fountain Creek. Given the dramatic changes in <br />Fountain Creek upstream of Pueblo in Colorado Springs and Fountain, aggradation in <br />Pueblo should not be surprising. The magnitude of the changes in channel geometry <br />indicates a need for ongoing monitoring of the Fountain Creek channeL The <br />"Comments" section of this letter will address that issue. The third reason given for <br />changes was that bridge modeling information from the FIS was found to be inconsistent <br />with recent field surveys of bridges. We presume that recent field surveys are more <br />reflective of current conditions <br />