Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />The abbreviated Interagency Hazard Mitigation Team meeting and process <br />gave state and federal agencies an opportunity to look at seven consecutive <br />years of similar flooding disasters and to review their implementation <br />successes. The process highlighted which recommendations had remained <br />consistent over time, recommendations for which no action had been taken, <br />and recommendations no longer relevant. The team found that some <br />recommended actions were more important than others, and decided which <br />actions to move forward. The review process encouraged team members to <br />identify and develop action items that could, in fact, be implemented; lead <br />agencies that would take responsibility for moving the action item forward; <br />specific, time lines and realistic'implementation strategies. <br /> <br />The findings of this report are to be included in the State's Multi-Hazard <br />Mitigation Plan that will be revised by March 2000. <br /> <br />18 <br />