Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br /> <br />Without proper design or as-buiIt information, it is difficult to assess the reliability and <br />level of protection of the private ring levee. Based upon available information, <br />however, the ring levee likely does not provide for a 100-year level of protection, and <br />certainly does not provide for a SOD-year level of protection. <br /> <br />In order to achieve 1oo-year protection for the two residential structures, the crest of the <br />levee would need to be at an elevation of at least 1339.5' (MSL) around the perimeter of <br />the property. The levee may need to continue in an easterly direction toward East <br />Street from the point where it ties in to existing ground on the northwest side. This <br />continuation would provide flood protection for the north side of the property. In <br />addition, it appears from photographs that there is a low spot between the southeast <br />end of the levee and East Street. An extension of the levee for a tie-in along East Street <br />may be sufficient. The portion of the existing levee that is at or above elevation 1339.5 <br />would provide for 1oo-year protection. The existing level of protection in the current <br />configuration may be in the range of a 50-year frequency. <br /> <br />To achieve a SOO-year level of protection at this site, a ring levee would have to be <br />constructed to an elevation of at least 1343.5 (MSL). A SOO-year levee would likely not <br />be feasible do to construction costs and constraints of the existing roadway elevation <br />and the ground elevation of the surrounding topography. <br /> <br />The existing ring levee may meet Corps of Engineers criteria based upon available <br />information, however further investigations would have to be performed in order to <br />make a determination. It would be advisable to obtain results of compaction tests for <br />various locations along the levee so that the compaction results could be compared to <br />Corps criteria. It appears from the photographs that the top width of the Ievee may not <br />consistently be 10 feet, and the side slopes may be steeper than 3H to IV in some areas. <br />These issues would have to be verified through field measurements in order to <br />determine the exact geometry of the levee. <br /> <br />Overall, the private ring levee appears to be constructed in such a manner that it would <br />provide a significant benefit to the property owners during a large flood event. At this <br /> <br />14 <br />