Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Evaluation of Site "B" <br />Analyses for site "B" included evaluation of the existing levee near North 4th Avenue <br />and Boone Street in terms of its level of protection and reliability. The effects of the <br />levee on existing conditions flood boundaries were analyzed and a recommendation <br />was made, along with a cost estimate, for a practical closure structure where the levee <br />crosses Boone Street. <br /> <br />The original dike at site "B" was not sufficient to provide protection during the 1993 <br />flooding, and therefore sand bags were placed on top of it for an additional 2 feet of <br />protection. Recently, the part of the existing dike that stretches from Boone Street to the <br />northwest side of Island Park was improved by the City. The improved levee section is <br />approximately 400 feet in length and ties in to the railroad embankment on the west <br />side of Boone Street. The east end of the improved levee ties into the existing high <br />ground near the Rock River at Island Park. The improvement plans, developed by DGR <br />and Associates Company, originally called for a 12-foot top width, 3H to IV sideslopes, <br />and a levee crest near the top of the old dike. The constructed levee actually has a 12 <br />foot top width, vegetated side slopes of about 2.5H to IV, and a crest that is about at the <br />height of the sand bags (2 feet above the old top of dike). The steeper side slopes were <br />necessary due to property and right-of-way constraints. The top elevation of the <br />improved levee section is estimated to be 1344.5' MSL. The Ievee material (clayey soil) <br />was obtained from the South Tama Street construction project, and was compacted <br />using a medium sized sheepsfoot roller. The construction specifications called for 95 <br />percent compaction of the material. Based soleIy on the information that the <br />constructed side slopes are steeper than 3H to IV, the improved levee does not meet <br />Corps criteria. Field tests should be performed in order to determine if the fill material <br />was compacted to Corps specifications. <br /> <br />Based upon available information, it is estimated that the improved levee section <br />provides a level of protection near a 50-year frequency. This level of protection <br />assumes no freeboard on the levee, assumes that the levee is structurally reliable, and <br />assumes that the design drawings are tied to the same elevation datum as the FIS. In <br />order to obtain a 100-year level of protection, the top of the levee would need to be at an <br />elevation of about 1345.5, which is about one foot above its current elevation. In order <br />to obtain a SOO-year level of protection, the top of the levee would need to be at an <br /> <br />12 <br />