Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1\1-3 <br /> <br />TA8LE 1\1-1 <br /> <br />TYP I CAL STRUCTURAL AND FIJRN I SH I NG \IALUE~, <br /> <br />Locatlons/ <br />Type <br /> <br />___-.J~)ta 1 <br />S t rue!,!.!:.!c!. <br /> <br />Dollar Values <br />Fu!nlsl~ <br /> <br />Wheat Ridge <br />House <br />Conmle rcl a 1 un It <br /> <br />$20,000 <br />$40,000 - $~J,OOO <br /> <br />$ 7,000 <br />$10,000 - $40,000 <br /> <br />Lakewood <br />House <br /> <br />$50,000 <br /> <br />$15,000 <br /> <br />Jefferson County <br />House <br />Conm,erclal unIt <br />Traller <br /> <br />$20,000 - $50,000 <br />$40,000 <br />$ 7,500 <br /> <br />$7,000 - $15,000 <br />$10,000 <br />$ 5,000 <br /> <br />Golden <br />TraIler <br /> <br />$ 7,500 <br /> <br />$ 5,000 <br /> <br />A plot of the probability of a certain frequency event versus the mone- <br />tary damages resulting from the event is the Probability ~istribution' <br />of Flood Damages. The area under the curve gives the annual expected <br />damages. <br /> <br />Figures IV-I, 2, 3 and 4 give the Flood Damage Probabi lity Distribution <br />and annua 1 damages for Lena Gu 1 ch in Wheat F\i dge, Lakewood, Je He rson <br />County and Golden, Note that these figures are not proportioned to the <br />tributary area of each entity. Table IV-2 presents a tabulation of <br />damage in each governmental entity. <br /> <br />Damage if Maple Grove Reservoi r Were Removed. Once the flood flo",s were <br />determined for future conditions with ~Iap~ie-Grove Reservoir removed, the <br />flood plain was again determined. This information was then used to <br />determine the Flood Damage Probability Distribution and annual damages <br />without Maple Grove Reservoir, See Figure IV-5, The same valuation of <br />structures, contents and damage curveS were utilized in this deter- <br />mination as were used in Phase A, 50 that Figure 1\1-5 would relate di- <br />rectly to Figures 1\1-1, 2, 3 and 4. fhe ,'eader can refer to Section IX <br />for an evaluation of Maple Grove Reservoi,', <br />