My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06691
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06691
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:23 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:27:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
44
County
Adams
Arapahoe
Douglas
Community
Denver Metro Region
Stream Name
Lena Gulch
Basin
South Platte
Title
Master Drainage Plan - Lena Gulch Volume I
Date
6/1/1975
Designation Date
7/1/1975
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I V-2 <br /> <br />Special Usage of Program. Since thi. pro~ram has been found to be more <br />suitable for use in analyzing large rivers rather than intermittent, <br />steeply sloped gulches, some special consideration y,la~, necessary for usaqe <br />on Lena Gulch. This was done by specifying extra cross sections near <br />culverts so that the sudden transitions and expansions in channel cross- <br />sectional areas could be adequately handl ed. <br /> <br />The 11l0-year future discharges were routed and the ",ater surface pro- <br />file determined. Using this information, the flood plain was plotted <br />on the 1 inch to 100 foot scale mapping. The program output then gives <br />more than enough flow information to estimate within a few inches the <br />flow profiles for other frequencies. <br /> <br />FLOOD DAMAGES <br /> <br />The floodplains and depths plotted on the 1 inch to 100 foot scale map- <br />ping revealed the extent of flooding by incremental reaches of the gulch. <br />The extent of flooding was related to general first floor levels of <br />structures. Damages were then tabulated according to type of structure <br />and similarity of levels of flooding for each reach. <br /> <br />USACE damages curves were then used to calculate percentages of struc- <br />tural and contents damages for the various levels of flooding. The <br />USACE curves do provide estimates of flood damage for water levels which <br />are lower than the first floor elevation, In this vial', damage due to <br />excessively high water tables is also included. <br /> <br />The actual valuation of structures and contents determined for each <br />reach was based upon insurance company estimates, estimates by local <br />governmental entities, various real estate evaluations and general ex- <br />perience in the Denver region by our office. <br /> <br />Table IV-l presents some of the typical average values that were appl led. <br />(Note that in specific instances other values were used). This provided <br />a basis for estimating the dollar value for the 10, 25, and 100-year flood <br />events. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.