Laserfiche WebLink
<br />24 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5. ACCURACY OF DAMAGE ESTIMATES <br /> <br />In general, estimates of damage contain a high degree of uncertainty. Ideally, estimation <br />errors would be measured by systematically comparing estimates with actual costs, which often <br />are not known until long after a flood event. Unfortunately, actual cost data are seldom collected <br />in a form that can be compared with estimates made at the time of the flood. This section <br />examines the accuracy of flood damage estimates in two ways: (1) by comparing estimates with <br />actual costs in one large flood disaster, and (2) by comparing pairs of estimates from different <br />sources for many flood events. <br /> <br />A. Errors in Early Damage Estimates <br />NWS flood damage estimates are usually compiled within three months after a flood <br />event, long before the actual costs can be known. Until recently, even in serious disasters, actual <br />total damage costs were not systematically compiled by any agency. There was no way of <br />checking the accuracy, or even the reasonableness, of most damage estimates. <br /> <br />In recent years, however, FEMA has systematically collected cost data for the programs <br />it administers - admittedly only a fraction of total disaster costs. Beginning in 1992, FEMA <br />instituted a computerized system for recording and tracking applications for federal assistance in <br />presidentially declared disasters. State and county governments have gradually developed the <br />capabilities to link to this system. The damage estimates submitted by local officials to FEMA <br />probably represent the best available early estimates under disaster conditions. A team visits <br />each damage site to view the extent of losses and make preliminary estimates. Thus, in some <br />disasters and some jurisdictions, it is now possible to systematically compare early damage <br />estimates with actual costs. Data from FEMA's Public Assistance Program are particularly <br />appropriate for our purposes because a large portion of the losses involve physical damage to <br />property. Public assistance covers damage to public facilities such as roads and bridges, schools, <br />government buildings, and nonprofit agencies. <br /> <br />In the aftermath of a natural disaster, damage information is assembled according to <br />guidelines established by FEMA. The following stages are described by FEMA (1998) and <br />Michael Sabbaghian' of the California Office of Emergency Services (OBS) (personal <br />communication 8/30/00). <br /> <br />(1) Initial Damage Estimate (IDE): Local officials provide estimates of physical damage <br />based on early reports and descriptions, without necessarily visiting the damage sites. <br />(2) Preliminary Damage Assessment (PDA): A team including local, state, and FEMA <br />officials visits the damage sites to do a "windshield estimate," perhaps viewing the sites <br />from a car window or walking around. The PDA estimates are used to decide whether <br />federal assistance is needed. If so, they are submitted to FEMA as part of the govemor's <br />request for a presidential disaster declaration. <br /> <br />'Michael Sabbaghian, Deputy Public Assistance Officer for the California OES, manages disaster recovery activities <br />for infrastructure and is responsible for grant management. He explained the process for estimating and recording <br />losses in presidentially declared disasters. He also provided the damage estimates and cost data for the 1998 <br />California EI Nino disaster, which is used in this section. <br />