Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 27 - <br /> <br />!t <br />it' <br />.' <br />"'\ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~' <br />( <br />~' <br /> <br />Standard structural design and cost estimates were made. <br />Embankment slopes of 3:1 and 2:1 were used for structures under <br />thirty feet in height. For structures over thirty feet in height, <br />embankment slopes of 3t:l and 2:1 were used. Cost estimates were <br />based 0'1 current Colorado Pilot Watershed and Public Law 566 contract <br />costs. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The geologic and topographic conditions and "cut" and "fill" <br />relationships are suitable for earth spillways. The emergency <br />spillway discharges will be confined with compacted, moisture- <br />controlled, earth-wing dikes. <br /> <br /> <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />l <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Twenty-three of the 24 proposed floodwater-retarding structures are <br />classifi2d as class .'a" structures. Structure FP-Pl is classifiec'. as <br />a class "c" structure. These structure classifications are based <br />on an interpretation of definitions in the Engineering Memorandum SCS <br />No. 27. The sediment storage capacity in each of the twenty-four <br />structures is provided to contain the estimated accumulation at each <br />site for the next 50 years. The floodwater-retarding capacity for <br />the class "a" structures was based on the runoff from a 25-year, <br />six-hour storm for those structures emptying in 48 hours or less and <br />a 25-year, 24-hour storm for those structures emptying in a longer <br />period of time. The floodwater-retarding capacity for the class "d' <br />structure l~S based on the runoff from a 100-ye~r, si;:-hour <br />stome, <br /> <br />r:- <br />t. <br /> <br />The principal spillways 1'Jill be reinforced concrete pipe and will <br />be equipped with an ungated, reinforced concrete riser to the height <br />of the expected level of sediment deposition at the upstream face <br />of the dam as shown on Figure 3. Release rates of these spillways <br />conform to Colorado State policies with the exception of structures <br />in the East Cherry Creek subwatershed where special permission was <br />obtained for prolonged maximum release rates in order to reduce <br />overbank flooding in downstream areas, <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />~. <br />~ <br /> <br />Criteria for the emergency spillways is in accordance with <br />Soil Conservation Service Engineering Memorandum No. 27 and 31. (revised), <br />Advisory Notice W-428, and Section 3.21 of the Soil Conservation <br />Service National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Supplement A. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />For the class "au structures, routing of the 25-year frequency, <br />24-hour duration rainstorm for East Cherry Creek Watershed and six- <br />hour duration rainstorm for the remaining structures determined the <br />minimum crest elevation of the emergency spillways. The spillway <br />widths were determined by using criteria set up in Engineering <br />Memorandum SCS 31 (revised). The maximum capacities were determined <br />by using the width found and a depth of flow (Hp) equal to the <br />difference in elevation between the crest of the emergency spillways <br />and the top of the dams, These maximum spillway capacities are <br />equal to or exceed the required freeboard hydrograph peaks. <br />