My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06450
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06450
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:02 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:17:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
92
County
Jefferson
Community
Arvada
Stream Name
Ralston, Leyden Creeks
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - Ralston/Leyden Creek, Arvada, Jefferson County, CO
Date
8/1/1977
Designation Date
1/1/1978
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />i' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />SECTION I X <br /> <br />TABLE IX-l <br /> <br />MASTER PLAN COST ESTIMATE <br /> <br />UNIT PRICES <br />(Apri 1 1976) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />During Phase A, a benefit/cost analysis was completed, which while broad <br />in form, served to identify the alternate and the Frequency to be used <br />in conjunction with the designated alternate. <br /> <br />CONCRETE - Structural <br />Vertical walls <br />European type walls <br />Slab <br /> <br />Item <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Major drainage channels are often costly in an urban area because of right- <br />of-way~ bridges, and culverts, special structures, and in some places, re- <br />taining walls where a narrow channel must be designed. Many of these costs <br />can be attributable to other urban systems such as streets and traffic, rec- <br />reation and open space, and land development. The cost estimate brings all <br />costs together in the total figure; however, the financing strategy should <br />differentiate between the incremental costs when developing funding sources. <br /> <br />BRIDGES - New <br />Add to existing <br />Replace existing (with same) <br />Small foot bridges <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Total cost of construction and land acquisition for the master plan was ob- <br />tained and reduced to an annual cost. The I ife of most structures associ- <br />ated with drainage work is estimated to be 50 years; therefore, initial <br />costs were amortized over a 50-year period using a 6-3/8 percent interest <br />rate. Construction costs were estimated using the unit price listed in <br />Table IX-l, which updates the prices used in Phase A as shown in Section VI. <br /> <br />1,500 cfs capacity/barrel <br /> <br />SUPER SPAN CULVERTS <br />1,000 cfs capacity/barrel <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />EARTH WORK <br />Excavation - Urban <br />- Ru ra I <br />- Ponds <br />- Closed Conduit <br />- Structural <br />- Mole tunnel <br />Placement - Structural <br />- Dam embankment <br />(Excavation & fill) <br />Riprap - Placed <br />- Gabion <br />- Grouted <br />Dumped <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The costs of land were determined by entity input during Phase A as to the <br />reasonable market value of developed and undeveloped lands. The cost of <br />land listed in Table IX-1 is given for land that can be acquired without <br />structures, such as portions of backyards. This figure considers the Fact <br />that, although portions of property will be lost by the owner, benefits <br />in the form of protection From future damages will more than offset any <br />individually perceived losses. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The construction costs have been broken down for each entity into: channel <br />construction costs, bridge construction costs, and right-of-way cost. The <br />costs include estimated contract values and an allowance of 30 percent ad- <br />ditional, which can be allocated generally: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Design engineering <br />Surveys and staking <br />Construction inspection <br />Administrative overhead <br />Fiscal and legal expense <br />Contingencies, Miscellaneous <br /> <br />9 % <br />3 % <br />3 % <br />1.5% <br />3.5% <br />10 % <br /> <br />GRASSING - Natural - seeded <br />- Blue Grass - seeded <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />CLEANUP <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />30 % <br /> <br />LAND (WITH NO STRUCTURES) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Total master plan costs, reach by reach, for traffic modifications, channel <br />improvements, utility relocation and property acquisition are presented in <br />Tables IX-2 and IX-3. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IX-l <br /> <br />Unit <br /> <br />Cost ($) <br /> <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br /> <br />235 <br /> <br />115 <br />90 <br /> <br />s. f. <br />s. f. <br />s. f. <br />s. f. <br /> <br />25 <br />35 <br />15 <br />5 <br /> <br />1.f. <br />s. f. <br />1.f. <br />s. f. <br /> <br />275 <br />15 <br />375 <br />17 <br /> <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br /> <br />1. 75 <br />1.25 <br />1.00 <br />2.00 <br />3.00 <br />6.00 <br />3.00 <br /> <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br />c.y. <br /> <br />0.90 <br />25 <br />75 <br />50 <br />20 <br /> <br />acre <br />acre <br /> <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br /> <br />acre <br /> <br />1,000 <br /> <br />acre <br /> <br />6,000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.