My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06431
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06431
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:59 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:16:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Estimating Design-Flood Discharches for Streams in Iowa Using Drainage-Basin and Channel-Geometry Characteristics
Date
1/1/1993
Prepared For
Iowa City
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />05463090; map number 73, figs. 1 and 2). An <br />inspection of table 8 lists regression-equation <br />estimates for both the drainage-basin and <br />channel-geometry flood-estimation methods. <br />The 100-year Pearson Type-III estimate is <br />8,320 ft3/s, and the effective record length is 24 <br />years (table 8). The 100-year drainage-basin <br />regression estimate is 7,740 ft3/s (table 8), and <br />the average equivalent years of record for this <br />regression equation is 11.5 (table 2). The <br />100-year Region I, bankfull channel-geometry <br />regression estimate is 8,860 ft3/s (table 8), and <br />the average equivalent years of record for this <br />regression equation is 16.1 (listed in the first set <br />of equations in table 4). The weighted 100-year <br />flood estimate for this gaging station is <br />calculated using equation 16 as <br /> <br />Estimating Design-Flood <br />Discharges for an Ungaged Site on a <br />Gaged Stream <br /> <br />Design-flood discharges for an ungaged site <br />on a gaged stream can be estimated if the total <br />drainage area of the ungaged site is between 50 <br />and 150 percent of the total drainage area of the <br />gaged site by an adjustment procedure <br />described by Choquette (1988, p. 42-45) and <br />Koltun and Roberts (1990, p. 6-8). This <br />procedure uses flood-frequency information <br />from the Pearson Type-III and <br />regression-equation estimates at the gaged site <br />to adjust the regression-equation estimate at <br />the ungaged site. <br /> <br />QIOO (wg) = <br /> <br />(Ql00(g)l (ERLl + (Ql00(gdb)) (E(db)) + (Q!OO(gcg)) (E(Cg)) <br />ERL+E(db) +E(cg) <br /> <br />(8,320) (24) + (7,740) (11.5) + (8,860) (16.1) <br />24 + 11.5 + 16.1 <br /> <br />= 8,360 ft'is. <br /> <br />Example 7.--Calculate a weighted 50-year <br />peak-discharge estimate for the discontinued <br />Fox River at Bloomfield gaging station (station <br />number 05494300; map number 133, fig. 1), <br />located in Davis County, at a bridge crossing on <br />a county highway, about 0.5 mi north of <br />Bloomfield, in the SEl/4 sec. 13, T. 69 N., R. 14 <br />W. Table 8 lists a regression-equation estimate <br />for only the drainage-basin flood-estimation <br />method. The 50-year Pearson Type-III estimate <br />is 10,600 ft3/s, and the effective record length is <br />21 years (table 8). The flood-frequency curve <br />developed from the Pearson Type-III analysis <br />for this gaging station is shown in figure 3. The <br />50-year drainage-basin regression estimate is <br />7,600 ft3/s (table 8), and the average equivalent <br />years of record for this regression equation is 9.5 <br />(table 2). The weighted 50-year flood estimate <br />for this gaging station is calculated using a <br />simplified version of equation 16 as <br /> <br />(QsO(g)l (ERL) + (QSO(gdb)) (E(db)) <br />Qso (wg) = ERL + E <br />(db) <br /> <br />(10.6001 (211 + (7.600) (9.5) <br />21 +9.5 <br /> <br />= 9,670 ft'ts. <br /> <br />Calculation of Estimates <br /> <br />The regression-equation estimate for the <br />ungaged site is determined as one of the <br />following: (1) the weighted average QT(dbcg) <br />calculated from both the drainage-basin and <br />. channel-geometry regression-equation esti- <br />mates using equation 14 or (2) the regression- <br />equation estimate of QT(db) or QT(cg) calculated <br />from either one of these flood-estimation <br />methods. The calculation for this adjustment <br />procedure is <br /> <br />QT(au) = QT(ru)[AF-(2:;~:)(AF-1)} (17) <br /> <br />where QT(au) is the adjusted design-flood <br />discharge for the ungaged site, in <br />cubic feet per second, for a <br />selected T -year recurrence <br />interval; <br /> <br />QT(ru) is the regression design-flood <br />discharge for the ungaged site, in <br />cubic feet per second, determined <br />as one of the following: (1) the <br />weighted average of both the <br />drainage-basin and channel- <br /> <br />APPLICATION AND RELIABILITY OF FLOOD-ESTIMATION METHOD8 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.