My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06431
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06431
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:59 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:16:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Estimating Design-Flood Discharches for Streams in Iowa Using Drainage-Basin and Channel-Geometry Characteristics
Date
1/1/1993
Prepared For
Iowa City
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />basin and channel-geometry flood-estimation <br />methods or on the Pearson Type-III estimate <br />and only one of the regcression-equation <br />estimates. The design-flood discharge estimate <br />is a weighted average of these values in which <br />the Pearson Type-III estimate for the gaged site <br />is weighted by the effective record length (ERL) <br />at the gaged site, and the regression-equation <br />estimates are weighted by the average <br />equivalent years of record associated with their <br />respective regression equations. <br /> <br />Calculation of Estimates <br /> <br />The- weighted design-flood discharge <br />estimate for a gaged site as outlined by the <br />Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data <br />(lACWD, 1982, p. 8-1 - 8-2) is calculated as <br /> <br />regression-equation design-flood <br />discharge for a gaging station, in <br />cubic feet per second, (listed as <br />either method BFRI, ACRI, <br />ACRII, or BFRII in table 8); and <br /> <br />Eicgl <br /> <br />is the average equivalent years of <br />record for the channel-geometry <br />regression equation used to <br />determine QTigcgl (table 4 or 5). <br /> <br />If both the drainage-basin regression- <br />equation estimate QTigdbl and the channel- <br />geometry regression-equation estimate QTIgcgl <br />are not available for a gaged site, then equation <br />16 used to calculate the weighted design-flood <br />discharge estimate QTiwg) is simplified to the <br /> <br />QT(wg) <br /> <br />IQrig)) (ERL) + IQTigdl.)l iEidb)) + iQT(gcg)1 iE(cg)l <br />ERL+E(db) +E(cg) <br /> <br />, (16) <br /> <br />where QT(wgl is the weighted design-flood <br />discharge for a gaging station, in <br />cubic feet per second, for a <br />selected T-year recurrence <br />interval; <br /> <br />QT(gl is the Pearson Type-III <br />design-flood discharge for a <br />gaging station, in cubic feet per <br />second, as determined by the <br />analysis of the observed <br />annual-peak discharge record <br />(listed as method B17B in table <br />8); <br /> <br />ERL is the effective record length for a <br />gaging station, in years, <br />representing the QTig) analysis <br />(table 8); <br /> <br />QTigdb) is the drainage-basin regression- <br />equation design-flood discharge <br />for a gaging station, in cubic feet <br />per second, (listed as method <br />GISDB in table 8); <br /> <br />Eidbl is the average equivalent years of <br />record for the drainage-basin <br />regression equation used to <br />determine QTigdb) (table 2); <br /> <br />QTIgcgl IS <br /> <br />channel-geometry <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />weighting of two estimates based on QT(g) and <br />ERL and either QTigdb) and Eidb) or QTigcg) and <br />Eicgl' An example of weighting a gaged site with <br />only one regression-equation estimate is <br />illustrated in "Example 7." <br /> <br />By including both the drainage-basin and <br />channel-geometry regression-equation esti- <br />mates, or only one of these estimates, with the <br />computed Pearson Type-III estimate for a gaged <br />site, design-flood histories for a relatively long <br />period of time are incorporated into the <br />weighted estimate for the gaged site and tend to <br />decrease the time-sampling error (Choquette, <br />1988, p. 41). Climatic conditions during a short <br />gaged period of record often are not indicative of <br />the longer term climatic variability associated <br />with a particular gaging station. Such <br />time-sampling error may be particularly large <br />when the observed gaged period of record <br />represents an unusually wet or dry climatic <br />cycle compared to the longer term average <br />climatic conditions. Time-sampling error thus is <br />minimized for a gaging station by weighting the <br />design-flood discharge estimate QT(wg)' <br /> <br />Examples ofWeighting--Examples 6-7 <br /> <br />Examole 6.--Calculate a weighted 100-year <br />peak-discharge estimate for the discontinued <br />Black Hawk Creek at Grundy Center <br />crest-stage gaging station (station number <br /> <br />36 ESTIMATING DESIGN-FLOOD DISCHARGES FOR STREAMS IN IOWA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.