Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 2. Statewide drainage-basin characteristic equations <br />for estimating design-flood discharges in Iowa <br /> <br />[Q, peak discharge, in cubic feet per second, for a given recurrence interval, in years; CDA, <br />contributing drainage area, in square miles; RR, relative relief, in feet per mile; DF, drainage <br />frequency, in number of first-order streams per square mile; ITF, 2-year, 24-hour precipitation <br />intensity, in inches] <br /> <br />Estimation equation <br /> <br />Average <br />Standard standard error <br />error of estimate of prediction <br />LoglO Percent (percent) <br /> <br />Average <br />equivalent <br />years of <br />record <br /> <br /> Number of streamflow-gaging stations = 164 <br />Q2 = 53.1 CDAo.799 RRo.643 D~.381 (ITF _ 2.5)1.36 0.171 41.0 42.2 3.9 <br />Q5 = 98.8 CDAo.755 RRo.652 D~.380(ITF _ 2.5p.985 .156 37.2 38.6 5.4 <br />QIO = 136 CDAo.733 RRo.654 D~.384(TTF _ 2.5)0.801 .160 38.2 39.8 6.5 <br />Q25 = 188 CDAo.709 RRo.655 D~.393 (ITF _ 2.5p.61O .172 41.3 43.2 7.8 <br />Q50 = 231 CDAo.694 RRo.656 D~.401 (ITF _ 2.5)0.491 .185 44.5 46.5 9.5 <br />QIOO = 277 CDA 0.681 RRo.656 D~.409 (ITF _ 2.5p.389 .198 48.0 50.2 11.5 <br /> <br />Note: Basin characteristics are map-scale dependent. See Appendix A and Appendix B for <br />basin-characteristic descriptions, computations, and scales of maps to use for <br />manual measurements. <br /> <br />frequency are the number of first-order streams <br />(FOS) and contributing drainage area (CDA). <br />The value of FOS is determined by using <br />Strahler's method of ordering streams (Strahler, <br />1952). A description of Strahler's <br />stream-ordering method is included in Appendix <br />B. The 2-year, 24-hour precipitation intensity <br />(TTF) is a primary drainage-basin- <br />characteristic measurement of the maximum <br />24-hour precipitation expected to be exceeded on <br />the average once every 2 years. <br /> <br />Additional information pertaining to the <br />characteristics used in the drainage-basin <br />equations (table 2) is included in Appendix A. <br />Techniques on how to make manual <br />measurements from topographic maps for the <br />primary drainage-basin characteristics used in <br />the equations are outlined in Appendix B. <br />Several of the primary drainage-basin <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />characteristics are map-scale dependent. Use of <br />maps of scales other than the scales used to <br />develop the equations may produce results that <br />do not conform to the range of estimation <br />accuracies listed for the equations in table 2. <br />The scale of map to use for manual <br />measurements of each primary drainage-basin <br />characteristic is outlined in Appendix A and <br />Appendix B. <br /> <br />Examination of residuals, the difference <br />between the Pearson Type-III and multiple- <br />regression estimates of peak discharge for the <br />drainage-basin equations, indicated no evidence <br />of geographic bias. The drainage-basin <br />equations thus were determined to be <br />independent of hydrologic rcgionalization <br />within the State. <br /> <br />ESTIMATING DESIGN-FLOOD DISCHARGES USING DRAINAGE.BASIN CHARACTERISTICS 17 <br />