My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06431
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06431
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:59 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:16:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Estimating Design-Flood Discharches for Streams in Iowa Using Drainage-Basin and Channel-Geometry Characteristics
Date
1/1/1993
Prepared For
Iowa City
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />underestimation of 40 percent for the 10 <br />drainage basins tested (Eash, 1993, p. 180-181). <br />For this reason, the basin-slope characteristic <br />was deleted from the drainage- basin <br />characteristics data set during the initial <br />multiple-regression analyses. Basin-slope <br />comparisons appear to indieate that the <br />1:250,000-scale DEM data used to create the <br />elevation-contour digital maps are not capable <br />of reproducing all the sinuosity of the elevation <br />contours depicted on the 1:250,000-scale DMA <br />topographic maps. The elevation contours <br />generated using the GIS procedure are much <br />more generalized than the topographic-map <br />contours; thus, the total length of the elevation <br />contours are undermeasured when using the <br />"contour-band" method of calculating basin <br />slope (BS) (Appendix A). A cor>parison of the <br />elevation contours shown in figure 4C for the <br />Black Hawk Creek at Grundy Center (station <br />number 05463090; map number 73, fig. 1) <br />drainage basin to those depicted on the DMA <br />1:250,000-scale Waterloo topographic map <br />showed a significant difference in the sinuosity <br />of the elevation contours depicted. <br /> <br />Drainage-Basin Characteristic <br />Equations <br /> <br />The 26 drainage-basin charaeteristics listed <br />in Appendix A were quantified for 164 <br />streamflow-gaging stations (fig. 1) and <br />investigated as potential explanatory variables <br />in the development of multiple-regression <br />equations for the estimation of design-flood <br />discharges. Because of the previously described <br />problems concerning measurement verification <br />of basin slope and because of the difficulty <br />associated with manual measurements of total <br />stream length, six basin characteristics were <br />deleted from the regression data set. The <br />excluded characteristics were basin slope (BS), <br />total stream length (TSL), stream density (Sm, <br />constant of channel maintE'nance (CCM), <br />ruggedness number (RN), and s'.ope ratio (SR). <br /> <br />Several other drainage-basin characteristics <br />also were deleted from the data set because of <br />multicollinearity. Multicollin"arity is the <br />condition where at least one explanatory <br />variable is closely related tc. (that is, not <br />independent oD one or more other explanatory <br />variables. Regression models that include <br />variables with multicollinearity may be <br /> <br />unreliable because coefficients in the models <br />may be unstable. Output from the ALLREG <br />analysis and a correlation matrix of Pearson <br />product-moment correlation coefficients were <br />used as guides in identifying the variables with <br />multicollinearity. The hydrologic validity of <br />variables with multicollinearity in the context of <br />flood runoff was the principal criterion used in <br />determining which drainage-basin character- <br />istics were deleted from the data set. Upon <br />completion of the ALLREG analyses, any <br />remaining multicollinearity problems were <br />identified with the SREGRES procedure by <br />checking each explanatory variable for variance <br />inflation faetors greater than 10. <br /> <br />Statewide flood-estimation equations were <br />developed from analyses of the drainage-basin <br />characteristics using the ordinary least-squares <br />and weighted least-squares multiple-regression <br />techniques previously described. The best <br />equations developed in terms of PRESS <br />statistics, coefficients of determination, and <br />standard errors of estimate are listed in table 2. <br />The charaeteristics identified as most <br />significant in the drainage-basin equations are <br />contributing drainage area (CDA), relative relief <br />(RR), drainage frequency (DF), and 2-year, <br />24-hour precipitation intensity (TTF). Table 9 <br />(at end of this report) lists these significant <br />drainage-basin characteristics, as quantified by <br />the GIS procedure, for 164 streamflow-gaging <br />stations in Iowa. <br /> <br />Three of the four charaeteristics listed in the <br />drainage-basin equations (table 2) are <br />calculated from primary drainage-basin <br />characteristics. The drainage-basin equations <br />are comprised of six primary drainage-basin <br />charaeteristics. Contributing drainage area <br />(CDAl is a measure of the total area that <br />contributes to surface-water runoff at the basin <br />outlet. The primary drainage-basin <br />characteristics used to calculate contributing <br />drainage area are total drainage area (TDA) and <br />noncontributing drainage area (NCDA). <br />Relative relief (RR) is a ratio of two primary <br />drainage-basin characteristics, basin relief (BR) <br />and basin perimeter (BP). Drainage frequency <br />(DF) is a measure of the average number of <br />first-order streams per unit area and is an <br />indication of the spacing of the drainage <br />network. The primary drainage-basin <br />characteristics used to calculate drainage <br /> <br />16 ESTIMATING DESIGN-FLOOD DISCHARGES FOR STREAMS IN IOWA <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.