My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06381
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06381
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:50 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Otero
Community
La Junta
Stream Name
Arkansas River & Tributaries
Basin
Arkansas
Title
La Junta, Colorado Local Protection Project Phase I GDM Sediment Investigation
Date
9/1/1985
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers
Prepared By
The Hydrologic Engineering Center
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Fort Pueblo. These posts did a thriving business, encouraged settlement. and <br />flourished until the decline in fur trade. Then, they were abandoned and <br />subsequently replaced by military forts for the protection of the settlers. <br /> <br />The latter part of the 19th Century could be classified as the mining era. <br />which began with the discovery of gold in 1860 near Leadville. A variety of <br />mine~als was produced, and this industry stimulated the growth of others such <br />as railroad transportation, lumbering. and the manufacture of mining machinery <br />and equipment. These developments attracted thousands of people to the area. <br />thus providing an increasing market for agricultural products (4). <br /> <br />3.2.2 20th Century <br /> <br />with the beginning of the 20th Century, agriculture and related food <br />processing industries became the dominant factor of economic development until <br />World War II. Cattle ranches spread over the plains and immigrants from the <br />Midwest took up homesteads and laid out farms in the valleys where they could <br />install minimum facilities for irrigation of crops. As the demand for <br />agricultural products grew, farms were enlarged and irrigation enterprises <br />were organized. These industries established a more permanent type of <br />settlement, and the population grew rapidly (4). <br /> <br />3.3 Significant Impacts of Economic History on River Morphology <br /> <br />The economic development of the Arkansas River valley <br />significant impact on the morphology of the river. Settlers, <br />farmers and ranchers, altered the natural conditions with crops <br />and, as the population grew, impacts on the river increased. <br /> <br />has had a <br />particularly <br />and livestock <br /> <br />Irrigated agricultural practices eventually changed the natural hydrologic <br />character of the river. By 1895 there were 20 major irrigation diversions <br />between Pueblo and Kansas (2). These diversions also removed large volumes of <br />sediment with the irrigation water. The effect of crop irrigation was to <br />raise the water table (via recharge) above the river bed in late summer and to <br />change streamflow from intermittent to perennial. <br /> <br />The perennial river could support other types and amounts of riparian and <br />floodplain vegetation. Areas of prairie decreased as shrubs and trees took <br />hold. The exotic species salt-cedar (Tamarix ramosissima), a phreatophyte <br />native to the Mediterranean, was first observed in the Arkansas Valley in 1913 <br />and today thrives along the river. This increase in vegetation reflects an <br />increase in soil moisture due to the higher water table, a result of increased <br />irrigation. <br /> <br />These hydrologic and vegetative changes produced major morphological <br />changes along the river. Nadler (2) states that the river narrowed <br />considerably between 1926 and 1952 (215 m to 46 m); the 1952 width was only <br />2l~ of the 1892 width. The sinuosity of every reach of the river was greater <br />in 1977 (1.43) than it was in 1870 (1.15). <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.