Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />.... Ii" 0" ". <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Uncompahgre Valley Hater Users <br />Association and Montrose Partners <br />Docket No. p-6423 et al. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />capital into the development. Uncompahgre addressed those <br />points, but the Commission did not consider them. Had the <br />Montrose-ta-Uncompahgre transfer arisen after issuance of a <br />license or before the Fayetteville decision, it seems at least <br />likely that the Commission would have applied the Paterson <br />analysis. These circumstances give some weight to Uncompahgre's <br />claim that it is denied due prOcess where the Commission uses a <br />dual set of standards but has not defined the boundary between <br />them, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Hhile the underlying policy and deterrent purposes of <br />this order are unimpeachable, the sanction imposed in this <br />case strains too hara and pummels fair procedure to reach <br />those ends. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />