My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06313
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:35 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:10:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Worldwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Effects of Urban Land Use On Water Quantity and Quality: An Annotated Bibliography
Date
1/1/1979
Prepared By
University of Waikato Department of Earth Sciences; Hamilton, New Zeland
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BUCKINGHAM, R.~. and BETSON, R.P. <br />197e: -Faecal coliform concentrations <br />in storm waterw. Paper presented at <br />the American Geophysical Union, Slst <br />Annual Meeting. <br /> <br />Key words: <br />forms; <br />bacteria. <br /> <br />storm runofft faecal coli- <br />water pollution sources; <br /> <br />Recent limited storm water bacteriolog- <br />ical water quality sampling in the Ten- <br />nesse Valley indicates that high faecal <br />coliform loads are common in storm <br />water runo'f. In clean residential <br />Areas sustained high faecal coliform <br />loads were observed during storm water <br />runoff. The source of these loads was <br />associated with overland flow, and it <br />appears that staggered contributing <br />times account for the sustained high <br />loads. High faecal coliform counts <br />were also measured in storm waters ori- <br />ginating from agricultural areas and <br />forested watersheds. The consistency <br />with which faecal coliform counts in <br />excess of accepted standards are com- <br />monly found further substanti~tes the <br />need for an appraisal of this test as <br />an indicator of pathogenic organisms. <br />The data also point to th~ importance <br />of recognising the streamflow regime in <br />the analysis of water quality sampling <br />data since observations taken during <br />storm periods are usually high in bac- <br />teriological loads. <br /> <br />BULlARD, W. E. 1966: wEffects of land use <br />on water resources". J. Water Pollu- <br />tion Control Federation, Vol.38(4); <br />p645-659. <br /> <br />Key words: erosion; <br />toxicity; nutrients: <br />urban runoff. <br /> <br />pesticides: <br />solid wastest <br /> <br />Land areas included in drainage b~sins <br />or watersh~ds constitute a source of <br />water supplies. Lane condition among <br />other factors determines th~ quality of <br />water produced. Erosion and Sedimenta- <br />tion, toxins and nutrients, and wast~s <br />resulting from lend use are factors in- <br />volved in water qU3lity and pollution. <br />Erosion causes turbidity and sed-imenta- <br />tion, lowers water quality, and damages <br />aquatic life habitats. Fertilisers, <br />pesticides, and oth~r toxins and nutri- <br />ents contribute to pollution. <br />Agriculture, timber, mining, urban ru- <br />noff, and recreation also are pollution <br />contributors resulting from land USe. <br />All of these sources can be controlled <br />to beneficial degrees by more effective <br />landuse practices. <br /> <br />BURGESS and NIPLE LTD. 1969: .Stream pol- <br />lution and abatement from combined <br />sewer overflows, Bucyrus, Ohiow. <br />Burgess and Niple Limited, COlumbus, <br />Ohio, 201pp. (NTIS PB-195 162, <br />EPA-11024rKN 11/69.) <br /> <br />Key words: water pollution sourcest <br />water pollution controlt storm runofft <br />combined sewers; overflows: pollution <br />abatement: b~ctcria: se~age <br />treatment; biochemical oxygen demand. <br /> <br />The report contains the results of a <br />detailed engineeering investigation and <br /> <br />comprehensive t~chnical stucly to evalu- <br />ate the pollutional effects from com- <br />bined sewer overflows on th~ Sandusky <br />River at Bucyrus, Ohio, and to evaluate <br />the benefits, economics and feasibility <br />of alternate plans for pollution ~b~t~- <br />ment from the combin~d sewer overflows. <br />The city of Bucyrus is locat~d near th~ <br />upper end of the Sandusky River basin <br />which is tributary to lake ~rie. <br />Bucyrus has an incor~rated area of <br />about 2.340 acres, a population of <br />13,08~, and a combined sewer system <br />with an avp.rage dry weather w~ste water <br />flow of 2.2 million gallons Q~r d~y. ~ <br />year long detAiled sam~linq and l~bora- <br />tory analysis program was conducte~ on <br />the combined sewer overflows in which <br />the overflows w~re measured ?nd samplen <br />at three locations co~prisinq 64 ?er- <br />cent of the city's sewered are~ and the <br />river flow was measured and sampled <br />above and below 9ucyrus. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />BURM, R.J. 1967: wThe bacteriological ef- <br />fect of combined sewer overflows on th~ <br />Detroit River-. J. Water Pollution <br />Control Federation, Vol.39(3)t <br />p410-424. <br /> <br />K~y words: f,:',!ec"ll coliformst c;(,)1!Ibined <br />sewers; storm runoff; water pollution <br />sources; bacteria: overflows. <br /> <br />A study was m~de of water qu~lity ~t <br />various points in the Detroit River be- <br />fore and after ruinfalls causing over- <br />flows of combin~d sew~rs. Effects of <br />these overflow~ on wuter qu~lity r~r- <br />sist for sev~r~l days aft~r disc~arg~ <br />has ceased. The duration of ~ffects <br />increases with increas~ in the inten~i- <br />ty of the storm. 9acterial densities <br />increased as much as ~ thous~ndfold <br />after moder~te rains, at s~mpling po- <br />ints miles downstream from combin~a <br />sewer outfalls4 Further downstream, <br />increases in bacteri31 d~nsities w~r~ <br />less but affect more of th~ stre~m <br />width. Faecal coliforms and fa~cal <br />streptococci. follow patterns similar to <br />those of total coliforms. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />BURM, R.J. et al. 1968: .Chemical and <br />physical comparison of combined and <br />separate sew~r discharge-. J. Water <br />Pollution Control Federation. Vol.4~; <br />p1l2. <br /> <br />Key words: biochemical oxygen dcmandt <br />suspended solids: combined sewers: <br />nitrates; phosphorus compounds; <br />nitrogen compounds; ph~nols. <br /> <br />A comparative study of separate <br />storm-sewer discharoes at Ann Arbor, <br />Mich., with combin~d~discharges in De- <br />troit showed th~t the BOD in the separ- <br />ate discharges was about 20 percent of <br />that in the combined disch~rges. <br />Concentrations lessene~ as dicharges <br />progressed. values for total and vola- <br />tile suspended solids and for total and <br />volatile settleable solids were higher <br />in the separate system because of gre- <br />ater erosion in hillier terrain. <br />Phosphates were higher in combin~d <br />flows, but nitr~tes were low~r. Hiqh~r <br />concentrations also were found in the <br />combined system for phenols, NU3-N, and <br />organic"N. In the separate system, BOD <br /> <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.