Laserfiche WebLink
<br />! <br /> <br />1...- <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />! <br />i <br />f <br />, <br />I' ' <br /> <br />There was no distinct separation between the two curves. The results <br /> <br />were not considered indicative of flooding potential of the basin. <br /> <br />Insufficient streamflow record and the location of the gage were con- <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />\ <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />sidered responsible for these results, Since results were not indicative <br /> <br />of ,the entire area and were ~nreliable, flow frequency parameters were <br /> <br />developed from "Manual 'for Estimating Flood Characteristics of Natural- <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Flow Streams in Colorado" by the u.S. Geological Survey. Equations for <br /> <br />computing the lOa-year and la-year floods as developed for the Southern <br /> <br />Plateau Region of Colorado were used and are as follows: <br /> <br />i <br />, <br /> <br />Q ~ 59.7 AO.709 <br />10 <br />Q ~ l03 AO.710 <br />100 <br /> <br />where Q is the lO-year peak flow, Q is the lOa-year peak flow, and <br />10 100 <br />A is the drainage area in square miles, <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />, <br />i <br />, <br />~ <br />; <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />There is no streamflow record for Zapata Creek and tributaries, It was <br /> <br />therefore necessary to do,a regional frequency study to develop basic <br /> <br />m <br />, <br />i <br />I <br />t <br />I <br /> <br />discharge frequency relationships, Since flows from the North Zapata <br /> <br />Creek, Middle Zapata Creek, South Zapata Creek, and tributaries are pre_ <br /> <br />dominantly caused by spring snowmelt runoff, sixteen stream gaging <br /> <br />stations reflecting snowmelt runoff in the Rio Grande Basin were selected <br /> <br />for frequency analysis, Discharge frequency relationships for each sta- <br /> <br />tion were computed by methods outlined in WRC Bulletin 15,' The lOa-year <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-'- <br />