Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Cross sections for the backwater analyses were digitized from 1982 <br />aerial photography (Reference,6). Since the cross sections for <br />the White River did not include any below-water geometry, adjusted <br />discharge values were used in the HEC-2 analysis for that stream. <br />The adjusted discharge values were determined by reducing the peak <br />discharges, as shown in Table 1, by the flow in the White River at <br />the time of the aerial photogfaphy. The flow in the river at the <br />time of the photography was obtained from records at the USGS gaging <br />station No. 0906300. <br /> <br />The State Highway 64 and South White Avenue bridges over the White <br />River and all culverts along College Canyon Draw and Coal Mine <br />Draw were field surveyed to obtain elevation data and structural <br />geometry. <br /> <br />Locations of selected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses <br />are shown on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1). For stream segments <br />for which a floodway was comp~ted (Section 4.2), selected cross <br />section locations are also shpwn on the Flood Boundary and Floodway <br />Map (Exhibit 2). <br /> <br />Roughness coefficients (Manning's IOn") were determined by field <br />observation. The coefficients used were 0.040 for the main channel <br />and 0.060 for the overbank areas on the White River, and 0.040 for <br />both the main stream and overbank areas of Coal Mine Draw. Rough- <br />ness coefficients for the main channel and overbank areas of College <br />Canyon Draw varied from 0.040; to 0.045. A slope area normal-depth <br />computation was used to deter~ine starting water-surface elevations <br />for all floods. <br /> <br />The effect of ice jams on flood hazards within Rangely were not <br />reflected in the hydraulic analyses for this study. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses for this study were based on unobstructed <br />flow. The flood elevations shown on the profiles are thus con- <br />sidered valid only if hydraulic structures remain unobstructed, <br />operate properly, and do not tail. <br /> <br />Two culverts at street crossipgs along College Canyon Draw limit <br />the stream carrying capacity. Limited culvert capacity at South <br />White Avenue causes 50-, 100-, and 500-year flows to escape the <br />channel along the right overbank. These flows result in shallow <br />flooding extending north along South White Avenue and east along <br />East Main Street. Limited cu~vert capacity at Prospect Street <br />causes 10-, 50-, 100-, and SOb-year flows to escape the channel <br />along the right overbank and ~o flow north to the White River. <br /> <br />Normal-depth analyses were used to determine the depth of flooding <br />resulting from the overflows from College Canyon Draw. The shallow <br />100-year overflows occurring at South White Avenue and Prospect <br />Street were determined to have depths averaging less than 1.0 foot. <br /> <br />) 0 <br />