My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06061
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:45 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:58:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
Colorado River/Great Basin
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, Colorado River and Great Basin Drainages
Date
1/1/1984
Prepared By
COE
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />12 <br /> <br />One approach to regional patterns was based on maximum I-day precipitation <br />for each month in the least-orographic regions in the Southwest. All long- <br />record (>20 years) stations considered least-orographic within each subregion <br />are listed in table 2.2 and are located by numbered dots in figure 2.1. Max- <br />imum monthly I-day rains were obtained from Technical Paper No. 16 (Jennings <br />1952) and supplemented by recent records through 1970. Averaged maximum <br />values, by month within each subregion, were helpful but not sufficient to <br />define regional patterns, due primarily to the small number of data points. <br />A further step of adjusting the data to a common elevation and for upwind <br />barriers did not help materially. <br /> <br />Additional guidance for regional patterns of 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) convergence <br />PMP came from analysis of moisture potential. The Climatic Atlas (Environ- <br />mental Science Services Administration 1968) presents charts of maximum <br />persisting l2-hr 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) dew points covering the 48 conterminuous <br />states. These charts were used because they portray the broadscale moisture <br />patterns influencing the Southwest. The use of revised moisture charts for <br />the Southwest would not affect the conclusions on moisture patterns based on <br />that Atlas. Figure 2.3 shows examples of schematic charts adapted from the <br />January and August dew point charts from the Atlas. These schematics sug- <br />gest the source of atmospheric moisture for the region. The solid lines are <br />used to imply moisture from the Gulf of Mexico, while the dashed lines sug- <br />gest moisture from Pacific Ocean sources. The change in orientation of <br />the dashed lines between January and August reflects a change from mid- <br />latitude storms in winter and spring to moisture surges from tropical lati- <br />tudes in late summer. The dotted lines represent smoothing in the transition <br />zone between the two moisture sources. <br /> <br />The moisture patterns for each of the months give guidance to the pattern <br />of regional variation but not to magnitude of precipitation. They show that <br />the tropical Pacific moisture source has its greatest influence over the <br />southwest region from May through October. <br /> <br />The Gulf of Mexico is recognized by many researchers as a source for much <br />of the day-to-day precipitation over the Southwest. However, such rainfall <br />occurrences are not representative of conditions for extreme precipitation <br />(Hansen 1975a, 1975b). Precipitation climatology studies of the Southwest by <br />Schwarz and Hansen (1978) supports this interpretation. <br /> <br />2.2.4 Seasonal Variation <br /> <br />Clues to regional patterns of 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) convergence PMP for each <br />month can also be obtained from analyses of seasonal trends in precipitation <br />data at various locations. Therefore, the seasonal variations of the maximum <br />I-day precipitation for the stations in least-orographic subregions shown in <br />figure 2.1 and listed in table 2.2 were analyzed. Seasonal charts, figures <br />2.4a to 2.4e, show monthly averages within each subregion by open circles, <br />along with an eye-smoothed curve (short dashes). <br /> <br />In figure 2.4a to 2.4e the regionally averaged I-day maximum precipitation <br />curves have a summertime maximum in all five regions except northwest Nevada, <br />which shows a summer minimum and bimodal winter and late spring maximum. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.