My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06061
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:45 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:58:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
Colorado River/Great Basin
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, Colorado River and Great Basin Drainages
Date
1/1/1984
Prepared By
COE
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />11 <br /> <br />The major nonsummer general storms such as February 3-8, 1937, November <br />25-28, 1905 and December 14-17, 1908, also indicated less than 3 inch (76 <br />mm) total storm amounts for least-orographic stations. Taken collectively, <br />and excluding the Porter storm, the amounts listed in table 2.1 are the <br />greatest known general-storm convergence point rainfalls for the Southwest. <br /> <br />The storm values were adjusted to a common elevation and duration, and to <br />optimum moisture conditions. The adjustments are as follows: <br /> <br />a. Adjustment for elevation. The events of table 2.1 were adjusted to sea <br />level (assumed 1000 mb, 100 kPa). This adjustment is the ratio of the avail- <br />able precipitable water above 1000 mb (100 kPa) to that available above the <br />surface. Where adjustments were necessary, the precipitable water was de- <br />termined using the storm l2-hr persisting 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) dew point and <br />assuming a pseudo-adiabatic saturated atmosphere ( U. S. Weather Bureau <br />1951a). <br /> <br />b. Adjustment for duration. A generalized durational variation determined <br />for convergence PMP was applied to obtain a common duration of 24 hours for <br />all the storms. Reference is made to figures and tables discussed in section <br />2.4 for the generalized relation. A monthly 6/24-hr ratio was interpolated <br />from the appropriate map (figs. 2.25 to 2.27) at the location of storm rain- <br />fall. Entering table 2.7 or figure 2.20 with the 6/24-hr ratio and the dura- <br />tion of the rain amount gives the factor by which the rain amount needs to be <br />adjusted to provide an estimated amount for the 24-hr duration. <br /> <br />c. Adjustment for maximum moisture. One of the steps in estimating PMP is <br />to adjust observed storms to the maximum moisture potential for the storm <br />location and date. Maximum l2-hr persisting 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) general-storm <br />dew points (Schwarz and Hansen 1978) were used in this adjustment. The ad- <br />justment assumes a pseudo-adiabatic lapse rate with a saturated atmosphere <br />and is the ratio of precipitable water for the maximum 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) dew <br />point to that for the storm. dew point at a location representative of the <br />inflow moisture. A further maximization was made by allowing the maximum <br />l2-hr persisting 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) dew point to be read 15 days toward the <br />seasonal maximum. <br /> <br />2.2.2 Enveloping l2-hr Persisting Dew Points <br /> <br />Enveloping l2-hr persisting dew points have been developed and presented in <br />HMR Nos. 36 and 43 and on a national basis in the Climatic Atlas ~nvironment- <br />al Science Services Administration 196B). The companion volume to the <br />present study (Schwarz and Hansen 1978) updates the data for the Southwest <br />and develops both general-and local-storm l2-hr maximum persisting 1000-mb <br />(lOo-kPa) dew points. <br /> <br />2.2.3 Regional Patterns <br /> <br />The adjusted storm amounts in the last column of table 2.1 were plotted at <br />their respective locations on a map (not shown). The few data points pro- <br />vided the lowest level of convergence PMP to be considered at 'these locations <br />but were insufficient to define a regional pattern. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.