My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06061
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:45 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:58:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
Colorado River/Great Basin
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, Colorado River and Great Basin Drainages
Date
1/1/1984
Prepared By
COE
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7 <br /> <br />2.2 Mid-Month 1000-mb (100-kPa) Convergence PMP Maps, 24 hrs, 10 mi2 (26 km2) <br /> <br />2.2.1 Envelopment of Maximum Observed Rainfalls <br /> <br />Record storm rainfall is the underpinning to any PMP study. We need two <br />restrictions to our data sample. First, extreme isolated thunderstorm <br />values are not appropriate for development of general-storm convergence PMP. <br />Such values rather are the basis for the local-storm PMP estimates of chapter <br />4. Secondly, in this section we are concerned with only the convergence com- <br />ponent of record storm amounts. No consistent method has been found for <br />separating total observed storm precipitation into convergence and orographic <br />components; however, we can restrict the data to observed maxima in 1east- <br />orographic regions of the Southwest. <br /> <br />Least-orographic regions are subjectively determined zones (shown in fig. <br />2.1) outlined on a 1:2,000,000 scale topographic map. The boundary of each <br />subregion depicted on the figure is not significant other than to enclose a <br />group of at least five stations whose precipitation we believe to be least <br />influenced by.orography. An appreciation for the complex terrain and an aid <br />in determining general limits for these subregions was gained by two of the <br />authors (Riedel and Hansen) during a 2-day series of overflights in 1972. We <br />recognize that some substantial orographic features remain within the 1east- <br />orographic boundaries shown in figure 2.1 but stations selected within these <br />subregions were judged not to be significantly influenced by orography. An <br />attempt was made to obtain an equal number of stations in each subregion, but <br />this was difficult to maintain. Station storm totals exceeding 5 inches <br />(127 rom) in 24 hours or less in the subregions were extracted from the histor- <br />ical records. The five storms meeting this criterion are listed in table 2.1. <br />One other storm for Porter, N.M.,.east of the region of interest, is listed for <br />comparison. Meteorological descriptions of each of the events is given in <br />the companion report (Schwarz and Hansen 1978). Each storm total is the <br />result of thunderstorms sustained over a period of 6 hours or more within a <br />more general precipitation storm. This distinguishes them from the isolated <br />thunderstorm events used for local-storm PMP. <br /> <br />The locations of storms listed in table 2.1 are shown in figure 2.2. San <br />Luis, Mexico lies just south of the study region. Since the exact duration <br />of the San Luis 1-day storm amount (Secretaria de Recursos Hydro1icos 1970) <br />could not be determined, a duration of 24 hours was used. <br /> <br />Two of the 5 values in table 2.1, at Bug Pt., Utah and Dove Ck. 10 SW, <br />Colo., occurred in the September 4-6, 1970 storm. These stations near the edge <br />of an outlined least-orographic region (see fig. 2.1) reported rainfalls of <br />6.50 inches (165 rom) and 6.00 inches (152 rom), respectively. They are on a <br />high plateau at elevations of 6600 and 6900 feet (2012 and 2103.m) respec- <br />tively. Analysis of orographic PMP in the following chapter shows that some <br />minimum-orographic effect is necessary over this .subregion. Analyses of other <br />notable general storms for the region (i.e. the September 4-7 and 11-13, 1939 <br />and August 28-30, 1951 Arizona storms), disclosed that maximum precipitation <br />for these storms occurred primarily in orographic regions. Total storm <br />amounts were all less than 3 inches (76 rom) at least-orographic stations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.