Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6 <br /> <br />2.1.4 Convergence PMP for Adjoining Regions <br /> <br />The Southwest States Region is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean <br />drainage of California. Convergence PMP estimates for that drainage (HMR <br />No. 36) were based on multiplying greatest observed ratios of p/M by ~ <br />(observed precipitation, P, divided by storm moisture, M , multipl~ed by maxi- <br />mum moisture, ~). The P/Ms ratios were associated withSrains at least-oro- <br />graphic locations such as on the floor of the Central Valley of California. <br />Enveloping values of P/M and a regional pattern of M were used to determine <br />a basic convergence PMP ~ndex map for 10 mi2 (26 km2)xfor 6 hours duration. <br /> <br />For the Columbia River drainage to the north (HMR No. 43), similar proce- <br />dures for estimating convergence PMP were used. The major difference from <br />HMR No. 36 was that regional patterns of convergence PMP were determined for <br />each month, October through June. These monthly maps incorporated the sea- <br />sonal variations of maximum observed I-day precipitation at groups of least- <br />orographic stations as well as the seasonal variation of maximum moisture. <br /> <br />In developing convergence PMP for the present study, reasonable consistency <br />was maintained with values for the two adjoining regions. <br /> <br />Also of some interest are PMP estimates for the United States east of the <br />105th meridian (Schreiner and Riedel 197B, and Riedel et al. 1956). For <br />these studies, the effects of steepening slopes near the 105th meridian in <br />Colorado and New Mexico were not taken into account. Thus, the PMP estimates <br />to the east of the steep slopes of the Rocky Mountains should be considered <br />nonorographic. The steep slopes east of the Continental Divide separate by <br />distances up to 300 miles (483 km), the region of those studies from that of <br />the present study. Sharp gradients in precipitation potential are expected <br />in this intervening region that do not allow detailed comparisons of PMP be- <br />tween the two studies. Some overall general consistency checks can be made, <br />such as the effect of moisture sources on PMP patterns, etc. Checks of this <br />nature have been considered in this study. <br /> <br />2.1.5 Summary of Procedure <br /> <br />The approach for convergence PMP in this study follows after but is not <br />identical with that for HMR Nos. 36 and 43. Instead of developing P/Ms ratio <br />envelopes, the greatest moisture-maximized observed rainfalls for least-oro- <br />graphic locations were enveloped. This is equivalent to the previous studies <br />[ (P IMs) envelope x Mx = (P x M,./Ms) envelope]. Monthly patterns of highest <br />moisture and seasonal trends in maximum observed .precipitation were used as <br />guides in interpolating between locations of highest moisture-maximized rain- <br />falls. The resulting patterns are consistent with patterns of convergence <br />PMP in HMR No. 43 and No. 36. The 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) convergence PMP esti- <br />mates were then reduced for effective elevation and barrier. Depth-duration <br />(from 6 to 72 hours) and depth-area ~rom 10 to 5,000 mi2, 26 to 12,950 km2) <br />relations were based on maximum observed precipitation in least-orographic <br />areas of the Southwestern States and those from eastern states data respec- <br />tively. These procedures are in general agreement with those used in HMR <br />No. 36 and HMR No. 43. <br />