My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05886
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:12 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:51:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
514
County
Denver
Community
Denver
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Denver, CO, Volume I
Date
4/1/1993
Designation Date
3/1/2000
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10-, 50-, 100-, or 500-year period (re~urrence interval) have been <br />selected as having special significance for floodplain management and <br />for' flood insurance rates. These events, ,commonly termed the 10-, 50-, <br />100-, and 500-year floods, have a 10, 2. 1, and 0.2.percent chance, <br />respectively, of being equaled or exceed~d during any year. Although <br />the recurrence interval represents the long-term, average 'period between <br />floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods could Occur at short <br />intervals or even within the same year. The risk of experiencing a rare <br />flood increases when periods greater than 1 year are considered. For <br />example, the risk of having a flood which equals or exceeds the lOO-year <br />flood (l percent chance of annual exceedence) in any 50-year period is <br />approximately 40 percent (4 in 10); for !any 90-year period, the ri sk <br />increases to approximately 60 percent (6 ~n 10). The analyses reported <br />herein reflect flooding potentials based pn conditions existing in the <br />community at the time of completion of ithis study. Maps and flood <br />elevations will be amended periodically to 'reflect future changes. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish the peak <br />discharge-frequency relationships fori each flooding source studied <br />in detail affecting the community. . <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis for Clear Cr~ek was performed by theCOE, <br />Omaha District (Reference 23). Their analysis was based on fully <br />developed .basin conditions. Discharge records for the Clear Creek <br />stream gages at Golden and Derby were analyzed using methods <br />presented in Bulletin No. 17 published by the U.S. Water Resources <br />Council (Reference 35). The results pf these analys~s were used to <br />calibrate to the following runoff! models: the Massachusetts <br />Institute of Technology Catchment Mpdel (MITCAT) (Reference 36), <br />and the U.S. Environmental Protect~on Agency (EPA) Storm Water <br />Management Model (Reference 37). MIT~AT was used to model the 400- <br />square-mile mountainous area upstrea~ from Golden; the Storm Water <br />Management Model was used to model th~ lower 175-square-mile plains <br />basin. Rainfall values used in the 'models were obtained from the <br />PreciDitation-Freouencv Atlas of the :Western United States. Volume <br />II. Colorado, published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric <br />Administration in 1973 (Reference 38)i <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis for Bear Cr~ek waS performed by the COE, <br />Omaha District (Reference 24). The IBear Creek Dam and Reservoir <br />intercepts flows from 239 square mile~ of the total 26l-square-mile <br />drainage basin. The remaining square~mile drainage area below Bear <br />Creek Dam still has the potential Ijlf generating damaging runoff <br />flows during a cloudburst event over the lower basin. No <br />applicable runoff records are available through this reach because <br />of the recent construction of the dlim. Therefore, discharges for <br />the 22-square-mile drainage area bellow the dam were developed by <br />using the EPA Storm Water Managemept Model (Reference 37) with <br />modifications by the Missouri River [Division of the COE. These <br />discharges were computed assuming ful~ basin development. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.