Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Blue River <br /> <br />DRAfT <br /> <br />There are only four locations on the Blue River where the flow <br />breaks out of the main channel area during the IOO-year flood as <br />analyzed. Three of these areas are a result of road crossings. <br />At the downstream end of the study, the lOO-year flood overtops <br />Valley Brook Road by approximately one foot. Further upstream, <br />just above the Washington Avenue foot bridge, the flow could <br />possibly break out along the east channel bank. More detailed <br />survey would have to be performed to determine if the breakout will <br />actually occur. At the downstream Broken Lance Drive crossing, the <br />two 5' diameter RCP culverts cannot convey the entire lOO-year <br />flood without overtopping the roadway about one foot. At the <br />upstream Broken Lance Drive crossing, there is a possibility the <br />the flow may exit the channel upstream of the crossing and flow to <br />the north along the east side of Broken Lance Drive. The mapping <br />in this area is insufficient to determine if this will actually <br />happen. <br /> <br />Of the four areas just described, the two areas which have the <br />highest potential for damage are the area above the Washington <br />Avenue foot bridge and the area above the second Broken Lance Drive <br />crossing. In both these cases, the flow could actually leave <br />general channel area and cause significant areas of shallow <br />flooding. In the other two instances, the flow will remain <br />confined to the general area of the roadway and the damage would <br />likely be limited to the roadway and embankment. <br /> <br />The greatest concern during a significant flood, would be plugging <br />of culverts by debris. Although under assumptions that the <br />culverts remain clear, Park Avenue (upper crossing), Ski Hill Road, <br />and Watson street pass the IOO-year flood, with the presence of a <br />minimal amount of debris, all these crossings would be inundated <br />and the potential for diverting flows into developed areas would <br />be significant. During a large flood, all culverts should be <br />monitored regularly and appropriate equipment ready to remove any <br />debris plugging the culverts. In the future, if any of the culvert <br />crossings need to be replaced, structures with wider openings, such <br />as box culverts should be used. <br /> <br />In comparing this study with the FEMA study, several areas of <br />significant differences were found. (Significant being defined as <br />areas where the levels differ by more than one foot). For the <br />entire reach from Valley Brook Road to the French Street bridge, <br />the FEMA flood levels are usually lower by one to two feet. At <br />the downstream end of the study, it appears that the FEMA study did <br />not consider the effect of the Valley Brook Road crossing since the <br />difference are up to 4 feet. Through the area of the Town Park, <br />the topography has changed due to construction of the Park and <br />realignment of the channeL Below the confluence with French <br />Creek, a rock drop structure has raised the flood levels nearly <br /> <br />35 <br />