Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II:""~ <br /> <br />.~ '. <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />- <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />-".' <br />'. <br />, , <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br /> <br />May 3, 2001 , <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Jim Mimiaga <br />Cortez Journal <br />37 E. Main St, <br />Cortez, C081321 <br /> <br />A word of caution! <br /> <br />As a visitor to the Dolores River' Valley r have enjoyed the riparian habitat <br />that enhances the scenic beauty of the area. It was easy to understand why <br />this route was included in the designation of the San Juan Scenic Byway. <br />That is why it is so disappointing to see the valley bottom lands overwhehned <br />with gravel pits. The rectangular, steep-banked pits remind ,an' obseIVer of a <br />flood plain covered with sewage lagoons. These pits, and particularly those <br />planned near the town of Dolores. not only detract from the beauty of the area <br />but are potentially dangerous. <br /> <br />High gradient rivers with large catchment areas are flood producers. As a <br />professiional geologist, I look at the Dolores River valley upstream from the <br />town and I see an alluvial flood plain with evidence that the river has <br />, repeatedly changed itscourse across, the valley. The stream is gravel-bedded on ' <br />'the an\lvialfloor and the$esafi'!,egrayels ~e being nlln~d.'T.hesegravelsthat ',: .',' <br />were moved by therivetin,th~ pCiStcu;ealsotised for dikes 1:Jetween thegtaver: ." .:: '.' <br />',": 'pits and the river. ,1l1iS means thegr'a'veldikes ciieuIistable:andWin 'fau. ,'.'.', .' " " <br />: . . - .. . . - . <br /> <br />Rivers always tIy to take the path of least resistance and what could be <br />easier than to exploit a hole in the flood plain? Numerous examples exist of <br />flooding rivers diverted by gravel pits into unexpected new courses that have <br />been very costly to man. This behavior ofrlvers is so well known I am <br />surprised it appears to have been ignored in the Dolores Vally. Recent floods, <br />, in the area have been relatiVely minor events compared to recorded floods in ' . <br />the past. Even the 10,000 cfs flood of 1912. almost twice the discharge of the <br />memorable flood of 1995, pales when compared to the g~ologic evidence of <br />earlier floods that were 3 to 5 times larger. My main point is that Dolorres <br />should expect large flood events and the gravel pits on the flood plain will <br />cause the channel to shift. It should be noted that although dikes along a <br />river can temporarity confine floodwaters, they provide little insurance against <br />movement of the channel itself. This is particularly true if the dikes are built <br />of rocks which the river is competent to move. Furthennore, dikes tend to <br />flush lower flood flows downstream and accentuate bank erosion in <br />downstream reaches. <br /> <br />Several houses in the vicinity of the newly proposed gravel pit above Spruce <br />Water Canyon are highly susceptible to flooding from any channel shift <br />induced by the pit and from proposed river confinement. Likewise, channel <br /> <br />i <br />