Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />Mr. Guetig's HEC-2 hydraulic computer models of existing conditions, dated October 23, 1996, were used <br />as the base conditions models in our review of the proposed conditions models for this CLOMR request. <br />We believe that, if the proposed project is constructed as described in the report entitled "Request for <br />Conditional Letter of Map Revision for the Big Thompson River, City of Loveland, Larimer County, <br />Colorado," dated August 1996, and as shown on the preliminary plans entitled "Centennial Village <br />Shopping Center, Rough Grading Plan Exhibit," dated October 1996, both prepared by Galloway, Romero <br />& Associates, the floodplain boundaries of a flood having a I-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded <br />in any given year (base flood) and a 0.2-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year <br />will be delineated as shown on the topographic work map entitled "Big Thompson River CLOMR, Existing <br />Conditions Topographic Data and Floodplain Mapping, Exhibit 3," dated August 1996 and revised <br />October 29, 1996, also prepared by Galloway, Romero & Associates. <br /> <br />When compared to the model developed by RCI, the submitted model of existing conditions along the main <br />channel of the Big Thompson River indicates increases in the base flood elevations (BFEs) for the reach <br />from West First Street to approximately 2,950 feet upstream of Taft Avenue and decreases in the BFEs for <br />the reach from approximately 2,950 to 3,350 feet upstream of Taft Avenue. The maximum increase in <br />BFE, 2.1 feet, occurs approximately 2,400 feet upstream of Taft Avenue, and the maximum decrease in <br />BFE, 0.3 foot, occurs approximately 3,200 feet upstream of Taft Avenue. The existing conditions model <br />indicates increases in the width of the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), the area inundated by the base <br />flood, in some areas and decreases in others compared to the SFHAs shown on the effective FIRMs for <br />the City of Loveland and the unincorporated areas of Larimer County. The maximum increase in SFHA <br />width occurs along the southwestern overbank approximately 500 feet downstream of West First Street <br />where updated topographic information reflects numerous existing gravel mining pits southeast of the <br />intersection of West First Street and Taft Avenue. During the base flood, all of these gravel mining pits <br />will be inundated by floodwaters. The existing conditions model indicates a decrease in floodway width <br />compared to the floodway shown on the effective FBFM for the unincorporated areas of Larimer County. <br />The maximum decrease in floodway width, 900 feet, occurs approximately 2,400 feet upstream of Taft <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />The majority of the proposed fill will be placed outside the floodway indicated by the existing conditions <br />model with a minor portion of the fill in the floodway. Mr. Guetig provided two HEC-2 models of <br />proposed conditions. The first model reflects only the f111 that will be placed outside the floodway and the <br />second model reflects both the f1ll outside the floodway and the minor fill in the floodway. There are no <br />increases in BFEs resulting from the fill in the floodway primarily because this area is controlled by <br />backwater from the Taft Avenue bridge crossing. The proposed placement of fill will reduce the amount <br />of split flow just upstream of Taft Avenue, resulting in an increase in the base flood discharge in the main <br />channel downstream of Taft Avenue. The BFEs will increase from just upstream of West First Street to <br />approximately 1,550 feet upstream of Taft Avenue, with a maximum increase in BFE of 0.57 foot <br />occurring approximately 150 feet upstream of Taft Avenue. As a result of the proposed f11l placement, the <br />SFHA north of West First Street will decrease from just upstream to approximately 700 feet upstream of <br />Taft Avenue. <br /> <br />The submitted analysis affects the flood hazard information for both the City of Loveland and the <br />unincorporated areas of Larimer County. The effective FIRMs for these communities do not reflect the <br />updated corporate limits of the City of Loveland. As part of any future map revision for the above- <br />referenced reach of the Big Thompson River, we will obtain an up-t<Hlate corporate limits map and identify <br />more clearly the reach within the City of Loveland. <br />