Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Included in the Technical Appendix, under separate cover, are the detailed <br />computations of the hydraulic calculations. <br /> <br />The survey bench mark descriptions and elevations used in obtaining the cross <br />section data for Coal Creek were: <br /> <br />a. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, 1934, No. Y 157 Located behind <br />the Old Jail House at Elevation 8908.699 <br /> <br />b. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, 1934, No. Z 157 Located at the <br />High School at Elevation 8885.343 <br /> <br />As shown on sheet 3 and 4, the banks of Coal Creek upstream of Elk Avenue <br />cannot convey 805 cfs of flow and split flows occur. The HEC-2 computer <br />program utilized the split flow analysis to determine the amount of the 100 year <br />flow leaving the left and right banks of Coal Creek. The split flow analysis found <br />that between station 51 +32 and station 51 +50 (cross sections 36 and 37),43 cfs <br />of flow leaves Coal Creeks northern embankment (left bank). The split flow <br />analysis further found that from station 51 +89 to station 53+94 (cross sections <br />38 through 42),86 cfs of flow leaves Coal Creeks southeastern embankment (right <br />bank). The HEC-2 computer program automatically subtracted the split flow loss <br />from the 805 cfs initial flow, thus 676 cfs of flow continued downstream below <br />station 51 +32 (section 36) in Coal Creek. <br /> <br />The remaining 676 cfs of flow in Coal Creek does not leave the banks of the creek <br />as it is conveyed downstream, through the Town of Crested Butte. The split flows <br />occurring through the Town of Crested Butte are upstream of Elk Avenue. <br />Ponding occurs at Elk Avenue against the pedestrian bridge on the south side of <br />the street, but does not spill onto Elk Avenue at the Coal Creek crossing. This <br />study is an existing floodplain analysis, and therefore routing of 805 cfs of flow <br />completely through town is not a part of this analysis. If Coal Creek were <br />improved to convey 805 cfs of flow downstream to Elk Avenue, Elk Avenue and <br />various other restrictions downstream, through the Town of Crested Butte, would <br />cause additional flow splits due to restricted openings and low channel <br />embankments. <br /> <br />5 <br />