Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />As this study was being conducted, homes were being constructed adjacent to the <br />channel in Reach 3. The developer had allotted a 30 foot right-of-way for channel <br />improvements in the upper portion of the reach, and approximately 4 acres of land area <br />for detention ponds in the lower portion of the Reach. However, these ponds as <br />constructed are capable only to effectively detain the 2-year runoff. Inadequate spillways <br />subject these ponds to potential erosion and subject the downstream reaches to additional <br />flood hazards. <br /> <br />In Reach 4, the basin is nearing total development. The storm sewer system in the <br />developed areas is generally adequate for floods up to the 2-year event. Except for the <br />area in the vicinity of the E. 112th Way cul-de-sac, flood problems are less frequent than <br />in the lower reaches. A detailed discussion of the existing flood hazards on DF A 0054 is <br />included in the Flood Hazard Area Delineation Report. <br /> <br />Flood Damag-e <br /> <br />The annual potential flood damage to public and private property within the flood- <br />plain is a function of the development within the floodplain. Unregulated, future develop- <br />ment would spread to the floodplain area and annual flood damage potential would <br />increase. With regulation, future flood damage potential would tend to decrease due to <br />the limitation of construction permitted in the floodplain. In the case of DFA 0054, a <br />Flood Hazard Area Delineation Report has been recently completed, so baseline conditions <br />have been based on the existing channel conditions subject to floods generated by the <br />estima ted future drainage basin conditions. <br /> <br />Flood damage to property is estimated by categorizing land use activities within <br />the floodplain. For each design flood, the floodplain was delineated and damage <br />calculated according to land use category and flow depth. Structural damage was <br />determined by estimating replacement costs for utilities, roads, culverts, and so forth. <br />For residential structures, flood damage was estimated by taking the property valuation <br />obtained from local developers and then applying a damage factor according to the <br />difference in the flood depth and the first floor elevation of the structure. The damage <br />factors were obtained from curves published by the Federal Insurance Administration, <br />Reference G. As a result of the flood which occurred on May 2, 1979, these curves were <br />modified to reflect less damage than is indicated by the curves when the flood eleva tions <br />are lower than the first floor elevation of the structures. Content damage for residential <br />strllctures was estimated by applying similar depth related damage factors to 5Q% of the <br />estimated structural value. <br /> <br />Flood damage estimates for each category of land use and design flood are listed in <br />Table IV-I. These figures represent direct flood damages. Other "damages" occur during <br />a flood which are not so easily quantified. Probably the most significant hazards <br />associated with the occurance of a flood are the threats to the health, both physical and <br />emotional, and safety of people. Additionally, there are flood "damages" which result <br />from inconvenience: interruption of traffic flows, obstruction of emergency vehicle <br />movement, and interruption of domestic services. Further, there is destruction of flood- <br />plain ecology, and parks and recreational opportunities. These intangibles have been <br />quantified in this analysis by increasing the direct flood damage estimates by 30%. <br /> <br />IV-2 <br />