Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />IV. <br /> <br />FLOOD PLAINS AND FLOOD DAMAGE <br /> <br />Urban Drainage and Flood Control projects are presently evaluated by comparing <br />amortized improvement costs with the average annual flood damage costs. The magnitude <br />of flood damages and costs for flood control improvements are directly dependent upon <br />estimates of flood flows and limits of the respective floodplains. Given the flood hydro- <br />graphs for floods in a range of recurrence intervals, dollar amounts for flood damage and <br />costs for implementing preventative measures are estimated based on an analysis of the <br />existing hydraulic conditions. <br /> <br />Hydraulic Determinations <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of DFA 0054 and its tributaries were <br />performed to provide estimates of the water surface elevations of each of the design <br />floods for the existing channel conditions. A total of approximately 6.3 miles of channel <br />was included in the analysis, however only 2.4 miles has been included in the Phase "A" <br />Study. All floodplains are delineated by routing the peak flood flow through the channel <br />and calculating the depth of flow in the channel and adjacent floodplain. The depth of a <br />flood, or water surface elevation, is directly related to the conveyance characteris tics of <br />the channel and floodplains: channel geometry, roughness, longitudinal slope, and <br />presence of obstructions such as bridges, houses and large trees. <br /> <br />Wa ter surface profiles and floodplains were computed using the most recent version <br />of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-2 computer program, Reference F. Cross- <br />sections were digitized when the topographic maps were compiled and have been <br />augmented by field surveys at culverts. Locations of the cross-sections and a more <br />detailed description of the 100-year floodplain is contained in the Flood Hazard Area <br />Delinea tion Report. <br /> <br />Channel roughness coefficients (Manning's "n" values) for these computations were <br />assigned on the basis of field inspection of the floodplain areas. Hydraulic losses through <br />culverts on Direct Flow Area 0054 have been determined with the use of nomographs <br />published by the Bureau of Public Roads and input into HEC-2 program. The structural <br />integrity of existing culverts, street embankments, detention dams and other channel <br />features has not been evaluated in this analysis. <br /> <br />Computed water surface profiles and the floodplain delineation for the 100-year, <br />future basin conditions event are shown in the Flood Hazard Area Delineation Report for <br />the main stem and two tributaries at 1"=200' scale. The original mylar FHAD drawings at <br />a scale of 1"=100' are on file with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. The <br />100-year floodplain is also shown in Figure IV-1 at a scale of 1"=1000'. Floodplains for the <br />2-, 5-, and 10-year events have also been plotted on working drawings and areon file with <br />the office of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. <br /> <br />Flood Hazard Areas <br /> <br />The DF A 0054 floodplain is presently utilized primarily for residential and agri- <br />cultural purposes. While some reaches are capable of conveying all or part of the design <br />floods, little provision has been made in the reaches for passing flood flows and the hy- <br />draulic analysis revealed that the potential flood induced damages and hazards are sig- <br />nificant. With the exception of some culverts beneath city streets, the entire channel in <br />Reaches 1 and 2 is on private property. Flood hazards in these reaches originate from <br />inadequate culverts and channel facilities, and undersized detention ponds. <br /> <br />IV-1 <br />