My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05331
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05331
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:48:55 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:26:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Hazard Mitigation in North Carolina
Date
1/1/1995
Prepared For
State of North Carolina
Prepared By
North Carolina Emergency Mmanagement Division
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />and equity capital infusions targeting disaster impacted businesses; business incubators linked to higher <br />education institutions; and the fonnalion of a minority capital program to assist minority business owners <br />and operators' <br /> <br />The vulnerabilities of Agri-Business should be factored into a long-tenn strategy to <br />reduce business risk in North Carolina. <br /> <br />The post-Hurricane Floyd recovery period presents an opportunity to consolidate and enhance pre-disaster <br />programs and strategies that are available to assist the agricultural business sector in North Carolina, <br />Slrategies to minimize agricuIlure business risk to future disasters may include the follo"ing: <br /> <br />Protection of farm facilities aod equipment. Future agri-business losses can be reduced by incorporat- <br />ing the basic principles of flood hazard mitigation into agricuIlure management practices, For example, if an <br />agricultuf'.ll structure or facility, like an animal waste s'ystem, must be rebuiIl, then that facility should not be <br />rebuilt in the floodplain. Steps can also be taken to minimize future damages of existing vulnerable buildings <br />through relocation outside the floodplain, or possibly through elevation, Proven flood-hazard reduction <br />techniques are well-known and available; the challenge is to work through existing channels (e,g" Coopera- <br />tive E.xtension Senice) and articulate the "economics of mitigation" message. More specifically, it is <br />important to be able to demonstrate to the agricuIlure community the potential losses avoided from flooding <br />and other natural hazards through the adoption of mitigation tools and techniques, <br /> <br />Purchase of iosurance to eover potential losses. Many of the agricultuf'.ll losses from Hurricane Floyd <br />can be covered by insurance. Flood losses of agricultural equipment and livestock can be covered by most <br />farm property insurance policies.' Crop losses for major crops are covered by the US Department of <br />Agriculture (USDA) Risk Management Agency's Crop Insumnce Program, While insurance is available to <br />cover most flood losses to agriculture, many farmers do not purchase policies, One of the stmtegies to <br />decrease the economic risk posed by natural disasters is to encourage fanners to purchase available <br />insurance. <br /> <br />Consideration of alternative agriculture maoagement practices tbat are more flood-resistant. <br />Agriculture production will continue to occur in or near floodplains in North Carolina, therefore it is <br />important to integmte agricuIlure management and flood hazard management practices. For example, some <br />livestock losses were caused by starvation when electrically powered animal feeding equipmenl could nol <br />function, due to flooding or lack of power, If livestock opemtions continue in or near floodplains, producers <br />should consider locating equipment above flood elevations, or the use of genemtors or other temporary <br />sources of electrical power, Crop production pmctices can be altered to reflect the flood hazard. Assuming <br />crop losses "ill continue to occur during major floods in fields located in floodplains, one consideration is <br />to plant more flood-resistant crops, gro"ing crops that are harvested early in the hurricane season, or <br />removing land from production that faces the flood hazard risk. <br /> <br />Multi-objective approach to maoaging ao agri-business operation. Managing a sustainable agricul- <br />tural business operation means that o"nership must be in compliance "ith a variety of water quality, health <br />and environmental regulations. Flood loss reduction and compliance \\ilh should be NFIP regulations should <br />be factored into a multi-objective approach to managing an agri-business operation, <br /> <br />Business risk reduction should address the indirect economic impacts as well as direct <br />economic impacts of major disasters. <br /> <br />One of the most significant findings of the post-Hurricane Floyd survey of economic impacts is the extent of <br />business disruptions due to indirect economic impacts, such as danlage to infrastructure, More than tv,ice <br />as many businesses reported disruptions due to indirect impacts as opposed to direct damages to their <br />facilities, The indirect economic impacts include road closures, loss of water and electric power, and loss of <br />function of wastewater and sewer systems. When infrastructure is damaged, customers, employees and <br /> <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.