My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05331
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05331
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:48:55 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:26:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Hazard Mitigation in North Carolina
Date
1/1/1995
Prepared For
State of North Carolina
Prepared By
North Carolina Emergency Mmanagement Division
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. hazard avoidance stmtegies, which are designed to remove threatened stmctnres from <br />hazard-prone areas throogh land use planning, and through the acquisitiou or reloca. <br />tion of hazard-prone strucmres and areas <br /> <br />. strengthening buildings and infrastmcture, which is designed lo protect property from <br />the effects of hazards through in.place elevation of structures, relocation of hazard- <br />prone structures, or floodproofing <br /> <br />. maintaining namral environmental features, including dunes, maritime forests, <br />vegetation, and wetlands that reduce flood, wind, and wave impacl~ <br /> <br />A fundamental question becomes, how effective are /bese mitigation/ools and /ecbniques in reducing <br />losses from na/ural disasters? <br /> <br />Hazard Mitigation in Nortb Carolina: Measuring Success (Measuring Snccess) examines this issue, It is <br />the second in a series of publications prepared by the \'orth Carolina Emergency Management Di\ision <br />(IiCEMD) that capmres and presents the unfolding role of hazard mitigation in Iiorth Carolina; how mitiga. <br />tion has been successfully adopted in communities across the state; and how mitigation is becoming an <br />integral feature of sustainable communities in the state of North Carolina <br /> <br />ABOUT THIS REPORT <br /> <br />Nea;~Jring Success has four objectives: <br /> <br />I. to promote an understanding of the principles and practice of hazard miligation, and how mitigation can <br />contribute to the development of sustainable communities <br /> <br />2. to identify and showcase successful mitigation practices that can serve as models for other communities <br />across the state <br /> <br />3, to introduce tools and technillues that can be used by \'orth Carolina's communities to measure <br />successful mitigation projects <br /> <br />4, to recommend a process and framework for integmting a quantitative approach to measuring mitigation <br />success into the Hazard Miligation Planniug Initiative (HMP!) <br /> <br />Neasuring Success contains sLx chapters: <br /> <br />Chapter I introduces the concept and practice of sustainable communities, the role of the HMPI in imple- <br />menting a community-based hazard mitigation program, and a framework and methodology for measuring <br />the success of mitigation programs in North Carolina, <br /> <br />Chapters 2 through; examine four integral aspects of a sustainable community - Housing, Business, <br />Infrastrucmre and Critical Facilities, and the Environment - and the mitigation measures that have been <br />implemented in communities across North Carolina to incrC'JSe the resilience of these elements to natural <br />disasters, Emphasis is placed on measuring successful mitigation practices that result in c1C'Jrly identifiable <br />and quantifiable omcomes, <br /> <br />Chapter 6 presents a process and framework for integmting quantitative mC'dsures of mitigation successes <br />into the Hazard ~litigation Planning Initiative, By following this process, communities across the state "ill be <br />beuer positioned to answer the fundamental question which was: bow bas the adoption and implementa- <br />tion of mitigation measures contributed to a measurable reduction in COmmll1lit}' IfUlnerabili()' to <br />natural bazards? <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.