Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Figure 1 <br />Counties Affected by <br />Hurricane Floyd <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />Affected Counties <br /> <br />rn1 Minor Damage <br />II Moderate Damage <br />. Major Damage <br /> <br />. The recognition that disasters directly impact the quality of life of a community. In <br />rural communities that are home to 70 percent of North Carolina's population, disasters <br />have had a tremendous de.stabilizing effect, disrupting the social and economic <br />equilibrium of these communities. Full recovery can take years, <br /> <br />. The recognition that communities can intervene to break the cycle of disaster damage <br />- recovery - damage, and in the process assume responsibility for making their homes, <br />businesses and utilities more resistant to the forces of natural hazards, <br /> <br />Hurricane Fran, which impacted 60 percenl of the state's population in 1996, was a major turning point in <br />!\orth Carolina's approach to planning and development.' Under the leadership of Governor James B. Hunt <br />Jr" a Disaster Recovery Task Force was formed to organize, focus and channel state programs and resources <br />to expedite the recovery of !\orth Carolina's communities following Hurricane Fran, Following Hurricane <br />Fran, the state of North Carolina has submitted to the Federal Emergency ~Ianagement Agency (FEMA) more <br />than 130 Hazard Mitigatiun GJ"dJ1t ProgJ".un project.' totaling more than $110 million. These funds have been <br />used to carry out a variety of initiatives: elevation-in-place of flood. prone structures; acquisition of residential <br />and business slructures; public education and warning projects; storm water management programs; and <br />support for the development of the state's Hazard Mitigation Planning Initiative, <br /> <br /> <br />In essence, when Hurricane Floyd made landfali on September 15-16, 1999 - three years follO\ving Fran- <br />the state of North Carolina was in the midst of an important transition, As a result of the progJ".uns and <br />initiatives that have been undertaken in the aftennath Hurricane Fran, the concept and practice of hazard <br />mitigation - those actions taken to permanently reduce or eliminate long-tenn risk to people and their <br />property from the effects of hazards - is increasingly recognized as an integral feature of community <br />planning and decision-making, In addition, it is recognized as essential to the long-lerm sustainability of <br />communities. <br /> <br />HAZARD MITIGATION: MEASURING SUCCESS <br /> <br />Hurricane Floyd presents a unique opportunity to examine the role of mitigation progr.uns and initiatives in <br />reducing damages and economic losses from this event. For the past decade - and particularly since <br />Hurricane Fran - hazard-prone communities across the state have developed and carried out a range of <br />programs to reduce their wlnerabllity to natural hazards. In North Carolina, four interrelated strategies have <br />been used to reduce poteotiallosses from naturai hazards: <br /> <br />. comprebensive mitigation planning, the ongoing process of identif)ing hazards and <br />wlnerabilities, and developing plans and implementation slrategies to reduce the <br />impacts of those hazards <br />