Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />From the 23 October, 1984 field inspection of the Gunnison, North <br />Fork of the Gunnison and Uncompahgre Rivers, specific bridges were <br />identified in the County which exhibit the potential for severe <br />damage from floating debris which has been deposited upstream of <br />those bridges in the 1983 and 1984 floods. Particular attention <br />was paid to these bridges and the river reach upstream of these <br />bridges. <br /> <br />For purposes of the cost estimate, certain <br />about the amount of material, access and <br />affect the cost of removal: <br /> <br />assumptions were made <br />other factors that will <br /> <br />1. Debris would be removed from the channel and channelized <br />floodplain. The trees and other debris on the definable <br />bank would not be removed. <br /> <br />2. The debris would be collected into piles every 200 feet <br />and burned to reduce the bulk and increase the ease of <br />handling and removing the material. One person would be <br />dedicated to control of the burning and no fire would be <br />left unattended. <br /> <br />3. The remaining material would be removed to landfill. <br />This would include ashes, unburned debris and streambed <br />material discolored by burning. The area around the burn <br />would be cleaned to natural channel color and shape. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />The job <br />County <br />and all <br /> <br />would require a full time inspector, hired by <br />to insure that the specifications were carried <br />safety precautions were observed. <br /> <br />the <br />out <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />The contractor would bid on a per acre price for <br />based on the calculated acreage of preflagged <br />areas. If, during the job, additional work was <br />the contractor would be required to removed the <br />from those areas at the price bid per acre. <br /> <br />removal <br />target <br />needed, <br />debris <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />The contractor would have <br />working conditions and other <br />increase the bid price. The <br />included in the estimate at 15%. <br /> <br />time constraints, winter <br />risk factors that would <br />estimated increase is <br /> <br />From these assumptions, the actual cost per acre for removal of <br />debris can be estimated: <br /> <br />1. The density of the debris above each of the bridges will <br />effect the cost for removal but the effect will be much <br />smaller than the distance the debris can be carried or <br />moved to separate piles for burning. The most economic <br />operation would be to push or carry the material a <br />distance of approximately 100 feet which would clear an <br />area of about one (1) acre. <br /> <br />A-I <br />