My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05149
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD05149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:48:25 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:17:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Delta
Community
Delta
Stream Name
Gunnison, Uncompahgre Rivers
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Cost Estimates for Removal of Debris, Bank Protection and River Training Along the Uncompahgre, Gunnison and the North Fork of the Gunnison Rivers
Date
1/1/1980
Prepared For
Delta County
Prepared By
Mt Highland Engineering
Floodplain - Doc Type
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />limited to $5,000. The following table summarizes these lower <br />costs when river maintenance work is assumed: <br /> <br /> HIGH NORMAL <br /> RUNOFF RUNOFF <br />BRIDGE DAMAGE $ 10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 <br />EMERGENCY $ 40,000.00 $ 5,000.00 <br />OTHER PUBLIC $ 10,000.00 $ 0.00 <br />TOTAL FLOOD COST $ 60,000.00 $ 10,000.00 <br /> <br />As shown above the probable flood damage to public improvements <br />can be greatly reduced. But, more importantly, the benefits of <br />the cleanup will continue far beyond next year's spring runoff and <br />would be an investment that could save the people or Delta County <br />millions of dollars over the next few years. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Removal of debris, fortification of the bridges and flood <br />protection of other public improvements would reduce the probable <br />flooding damage to private property during a flood. From all <br />sources, including interviews with landowners and field <br />investigation, debris removal and other projects designed to <br />protect the public improvements would reduce the private losses by <br />20% of the 1984 figure for a major flood. <br /> <br />However ~ a. greaterc_",l:'~cl:ggJ;;lon,:.,.of_,~os~s c,?uld be achieved by <br />channelJ.zatJ.on and ravel d 0 rpmo".r.],.l whJ.ch would allow the <br />river channel to agaJ.n arry flood waters around the farms, <br />ranches and other priva e improvements that must necessarily <br />coexist adjacent to the rive If all the private property was <br />included in a channelizati n plan, the probability of magnitude of <br />the losses experienced in 19 4 could be reduced to nothing. If <br />only 10% of the cost to annelize the river to within its banks <br />could be spent to prot ct economically valuable private <br />improvements, the major 10 ses could be reduced drastically. In <br />the long term, the benefits of continued protection would pay <br />interest on the investment \ in the form of increased production, <br />decreased losses and a stronger agrarian economy for Delta County. <br /> <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br /> <br />" ....-t. <br />~ t/,Y/.rrJ I <br />l L,'.\f~ \IV'v h, \ ,'~' <br />, " ~~ ''7 <br />. f)f'i/ViJ'-. ,~ If'" ,..)",- \ '" <br />t?:v" vJ\ <br /> <br />\ <br />\-1,1, ' <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.