Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i> <br /> <br />I. SUIt4ARY <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The 1982-83 budget calls for a spending program of nearly $52 million, of <br />which $17 million would be allocated from General Fund surpluses. This budget <br />initiates a five-year investment plan for total state spending of $764 mil- <br />lion, of which $539 million would be drawn from future General Fund sur- <br />pluses. Loans from the severance tax trust fund, monies previosly transferred <br />to the Water Resources and Power Development Authority (WRPDA), and a proposed <br />railroad car mile tax are recommended sources of funding for the balance of <br />funds. <br /> <br />CAPITAL INVESTMENTS BY AREA, FY 1982-87 <br />($ Millions, Inflated 11) <br /> <br />FY 1983-87 Pl an <br />State - $764.24 Million <br />1,299.80 <br /> <br />907.62 <br /> <br />FY 1982-83 Budget <br />State - 51.91 Million <br /> <br />39.68 <br /> <br />12.43 <br /> <br /> <br />27.25* <br /> <br />Water <br />Storage, <br />Dams <br /> <br />20.59 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />301.22 182.36 <br /> <br />i}1111.52~ <br />} 70.84 ...................... <br />.....,.....,. ........ . <br />......:.:.........:,..,. ...............,...-... <br />,-- --". ."......... <br />................ <br /> <br />. ...... .." c.......... <br />Roads, Sewers, <br />Bridges, Drink- <br />Rail ing <br />Separa- Water <br />tion Systems <br /> <br />8.14 <br /> <br />:::: \<.1 <br /> <br /> <br />Sewers, <br />Drinking <br />Water <br />Sy stems <br /> <br />392.18 <br /> <br />Roads, <br />Bridges, <br />Rail <br />Separa- <br />tion <br /> <br />Water <br />Storage, <br />Dams <br /> <br />* Includes funds to be expended in later years. <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />1/>1 State Share. <br /> <br />Federal, local, private <br />shares combi ned. <br /> <br />Ll Data Resources, Inc., fixed investment, non-residential structures implic- <br />it price deflator. <br /> <br />This budget and plan recommend the financing of projects above and beyond cur- <br />rent institutional and funding levels. Thus, projects which are now being <br />funded at Executive budget levels from the HUTF and federal highway funds, the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) water construction fund (including <br />feas i bi 1 i ty studi es for Cache La Poudre and Hardi n projects), and the sewer <br />construction fund are not included in this proposal. <br /> <br />The budget and plan are based on specific projects and encompass feasibility, <br />planning, design, and construction expenditures by project. The list of pro- <br />jects has been drawn from the Highway Commission's five-year plan, the Nation- <br />al Bridge Inspection Standards, the State Ran Plan and By-Pass Study, the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB), and the Colorado Water and Sewer <br />Needs Commi ttee. The projects i nc 1 uded have been ident ifi ed and pri orit i zed <br />by those agencies, using their established sets of criteria and processes. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-1- <br />