Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Rainfall volumes fop the 2-, ]0-, 25-, 50- ]00- and 500-yeap recurpence <br />intepval stopm ~epe assumed to deJ~ne hydpogpaphs of the coppeeponding <br />recuppence intepval flood from the Stop~atep Management Model (S~). <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />This report presents the results of the mastep d~inageway planning study <br />for Boxelder Cr€!ek and Cooper Slough. The pepopt was prepared fop ,the City of <br />Fopt ColZins, La'l'imer. County and Colo~do Water Consepvation Board. The <br />repopt defines the basic data used in the hydpologic, hyd~ulic and economic <br />analysis and presents possible altePnatives to solve the potential flooding <br />problems. One altePnative is selected, based p'l'imapily :m the economic analy- <br />sis, as the recommended imppovement plan. For this plan, a detailed <br />discussion of the preliminary design and plan implementation is presented. <br /> <br />Basin Charactepistics <br />The t'l'ibuta7'1J area fop the Coopep Slough basin is apppoximately 10.2 <br />squape miles. The basin is apppoximately six miles long and 1.75 miles wide. <br />The basin is fairly flat with poorly defined d~inage pattePns. The Cooper <br />Slough basin is undergoing development at ppesent, and in the future will be <br />almost completely urbanized. Coopep Slough flo~s in a southerly dipection and <br />joins Boxelder Creek in the vicinity of Prospect Street and I~25 east of Fort <br />Collins, Colo~do. The t'l'ibutapy area of the Boxelder Cpeek is apppoximately <br />60.3 square miles with an additional ]90.7 squape miles contpolled by SCS <br />Flood Contpol reservoips neap Wellington. The ,~tershed is about 32 miles <br />long and eight miles wide. The Boxeldep basin is mostly fapmland, except the <br />area within the urban growth boundary, "mere some urbanization is expected. <br />Boxelder Creek flows south and .;oinll the Cache la PoudPB River in the vicinity <br />of Prospect street and I-25. <br /> <br />Hydm.uZic Analysis <br />Hydm.ulic analyses of Boxelder Creek and COOpBP Slough ~ere carpied out <br />to provide estimates of the watep supface elevations fop floods of 2-, 10-, <br />25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year recurrence intepvals. The Apmy Corps of <br />Engineers' (CaE) HEC-2 ~ater surface profile computer model was used to deter- <br />mine the water surface elevation (WSR) at selected locations along the stpeam <br />channels. Cross sections ~ere measuped from topogmphic maps (J" = 100' with <br />2-foot contour intepvals) provided by La'l'imer County, Colorado, May, 1979. <br />Additional cposs sections ~ere field surveyed for a one-half mile reach above <br />Vine Drive on Cooper Slough. Field surveyed cross sections ~ere used in con- <br />junction ~ith map-interpolated crOss sections for the apea south of State <br />Highway 14 on Cooper Slough. <br />The results of the hydm.ulic analysis show a wide, shallo~ floodplain <br />~ith ponding behind T'Oa.dJJay crossings for Cooper Slough thpough the study <br />area. The floodplain for Boxelder Creek is confined to the channel valley. <br />Floo~tep fpom Boxelder Creek leaves the floodplain at Ppospect Stpeet and <br />I-25. The potential flooding caused hy this excess watep was not defined in <br />this study. <br /> <br />HydrQlogic Analysis <br />A hydrologic analysis was pepformed to detePmine peak flo~ rates and <br />flood volumes at variouis design points fop sevepal selected fpequencies. The <br />hydrologic analysis of Boxeldep Cpeek assumed developed basin conditions <br />~ithin the Urban Growth Area and existing basin conditions outside the Urban <br />GrOlJth Area bounda7'1J. Coopep Slough was analyzed for existing and fully deve- <br />loped basin conditions. <br /> <br />Economic Analysis <br />The economic analysis involved estimating flood damages, costs for dif- <br />ferent imppovements and the amount of reduced flood damages as a result of the <br />improvements. Three (Jeneral. improvement altePnatives ~ere consideped. <br />AltePnative 1 considers no improvements to the existing drainage system. <br />Flood damage reduction is accomplished by floodplain zoning, restpictions to <br />encroachments or development, evacuation of the floodplain, flood ppoofing <br />individual str>uctures or flood insumnce. AltePnative 2 consideped chan- <br />nelization and enlapged openings at channel crossings. AltePnative 3 <br /> <br />iii <br />