Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />The multi-objective planning process call be highly effective in identifyillg and making progress <br /> <br />toward achieving mll1lerous 10((/1 goals and solving problems simultoneollsly. <br /> <br />A'\'ORKSHOP LlKE THE ONE DESCRIBED HERE <br />can get that planning process off the ground in a <br />relatively short period by bringing everyone <br />together and getting all potential obstacles and conflicts <br />out in the open so they can be resolved. <br />Each planning area will have its Dvm unique charac- <br />teristics and needs, and hence the planning process ahvays <br />must be adapted to meet a particular situation. It is hoped <br />that the foregoing description of a workshop process can <br />provide a foundation for future planning efforts. The <br />multi-objective planning process can take many forms, but <br />it must ahvays <br />I. Cover multiple issues and goals; <br />2. Be based on an appropriately delineated planning "rea; <br />3. Be driven by locally identified problems, solutions, <br />and goals; <br /> <br />4. Use existing financial, technical, and programmatic <br />resources; and <br />5. Be carried out by a comprehcnsive partnership of all <br />levels of the public and privatc scctor, non-profit <br />groups, and individual citizens in an interactive, prob- <br />lem-solving, consensus-building procedure. <br /> <br />Multi-objective planning for hazard mitigation or any <br />other purpose is only the first, albeit most important, step. <br />Continuous multi-objective management follows naturallr <br />from implementing the measures that are selected during <br />planning. The sense of responsibility and commitment <br />that is forged during this intensive planning process, <br />coupled with the heightened awareness and improvcd <br />knowledge about the issues, should go a long way toward <br />ensuring that the ongoing management takes place. <br /> <br />. <br />