My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05009
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD05009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:57 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:11:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Multi-Objective Planning Process for Mitigating Natural Disasters
Date
1/1/1994
Prepared For
FEMA
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />USING A WORKSHOP TO DO <br />MULTI-OBJECTIVE HAZARD <br />MITIGATION PLANNING <br /> <br />""/lIlti-objective planning can be carried out through a IJltmber of difleretlt procedures. <br /> <br />Because so many different issues and, therefore, differem players are lIsually involved in multi-objective <br /> <br />plmming, the fundamental challenges are getting the kcy people together in one place to address the issues <br />and find sollltions, and getting public involvement and input. <br /> <br />THESE CHALLE:--JGES CAN BE MET through a <br />series of public meetings, perhaps held at differ- <br />ent locations throughout the planning area, or <br />through one large meeting and several smaller work <br />sessions, followed by comment periods, or by different <br />combinations of problem-solving and information- <br />gathering techniques. <br />The multi-objective planning process described here <br />took the form of a week-long workshop, which incorpo- <br />rated several different techniques for gathering public <br />input. This classic planning technique is sometimes called <br />a "charette"-an intense effort to solve problems in a lim- <br />ited amount of time. The idea is to have a brainstorming <br />session with many people and representatives from groups <br />and agencies from v..rithin and outside of the planning area <br />to come up with many ideas to solve many problems and <br />make other improvements in the quality of life-all at the <br />same time. Citizens are on hand to be sure that real issues <br />and feasible solutions are identified. Technical experts <br />stand by to answer questions about state or federal fund- <br />ing, regulatory requirements, ete. <br />A comprehensive, well-coordinated planning workshop <br />in which all interested parties participate has these advantages: <br />. Most significant local planning issues can be <br />resolved during the workshop. (Some may require <br />further technical study.) This would assure, for <br />instance, that a proposed hazard mitigation <br /> <br />measure would not adversely affect wildlife, or that <br />a proposal to rehabilitate a flood-damaged building <br />would not result in increased future hazards. <br />. Local problems and interests are addressed with the <br />benefit of technical advice from state, federal, and <br />other experts right at the workshop. <br />. Because all significant planning issues are dealt <br />with in one forum, the workshop is a much more <br />efficient use of peoples' time than having multiple <br />planning forums. The fact that the workshop covers <br />all the local issues makes it more likely that a wide <br />spectrum of agencies and individuals will attend <br />and participate. <br /> <br />The workshop is designed to: <br />I. Define the local problems, needs, and goals. These <br />will center around the natural hazard issue that has <br />been identified (for the Vermillion Basin project it <br />was flooding), but consideration should also be <br />given to all significant planning issues that can be <br />related to the principal ones. <br />2. List sensible ways to help solve each problem. <br />3. Specify sources of technical assistance and funding <br />for each idea, and how and where to obtain it. <br />Decide what group, individual, or agency should <br />have responsibility for carrying out the idea. <br />4. Set a schedule for implementing each idea. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.