Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. , .. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />XII. <br /> <br />The United States claims rights in and to the use of so much <br />of the waters of the Mancos, La Plata, Animas, Florida, Los Pinos <br />(Pine), Piedra, Navajo, and San Juan Rivers and waters tributary there- <br />to in the State of Colorado, as is or may become necessary for the <br />requirements and purposes of said r~servation having priority dates <br />as of the dates of the various acts of Congress, Presidential Proc- <br />lamations, Executive Orders and Public Land Orders which reserved <br />these National Forest lands. <br /> <br />XIII. <br /> <br />On October 25, 1930, a decree was entered in the case enti- <br />tled United States v. The Morrison Consolidated Ditch Company, et al., <br />Equity No. 7736, in the District Court of the United States for the <br />District of Colorado. This action was a suit, inter alia, for an <br />adjudication of certain Indian rights to the use of waters of the Pine <br />(Los Pinos) River in the State of Colorado. It was not, however, a <br />complete stream adjudication. In this adjudication, rights to the <br />use of approximately two hundred twelve (212) second feet of water <br />from the Pine (Los Pinos) River and one (1) second foot of water from <br />Dry Creek, a tributary of the Pine River, were decreed for use on the <br />Southern Ute Indian Reservation. This water was to be used for "nec- <br />essary economical and beneficial irrigation and for domestic purposes" <br />for some sixteen-thousand nine-hundred sixty-six (16,966) acres of <br />irrigable land on the "former Southern Ute Reservation," but diversions <br />were not to be in excess of one (1) second foot of water for each <br />eighty (80) acres of land actually being irrigated. No determination <br />was made in said decree as to water rights of the Indians for purposes <br />other than irrigation and domestic uses. No determination was made <br />as to other Federal rights to the use of waters of the Pine (Los <br />Pinos) River. Without a determination by this Court of the legal <br />effects of the Pine River decree upon rights and uses not asserted <br />and not at issue in that action, and not mentioned in that decree, and <br />upon the relative priorities as between decreed rights and rights and <br />uses not covered by the decree, the United States cannot properly <br />determine its rights in and to waters of the Pine River. <br /> <br />XIV. <br /> <br />The defendants and each of them claim rights in or rights <br />to the use of the waters of the Mancos, La Plata, Animas, Florida, <br />Los Pinos (Pine), Piedra, Navajo, and San Juan Rivers and their <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />- <br />