My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04918
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:23 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:07:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Adams
Boulder
Jefferson
Community
Broomfield
Stream Name
South Platte River
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Insurance Study - City of Broomfield
Date
6/1/1973
Prepared For
Broomfield
Prepared By
FIA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION OF WORK <br />Streamflow records are not available for the area surrounding <br /> <br />Broomfield, and discharge data for small drainage areas is very limited; <br /> <br />therefore, the conventional methods of flood analysis do not apply and <br /> <br />other methods were used to determine T-year peak discharges. Much work <br /> <br />has been done in the area of urban rainfall-runoff analysis by local <br /> <br />consultants, the U.S. Geological Survey, and other groups. The Denver <br /> <br />Regional Council of Governments with assistance from the Federal <br /> <br />Department of Housing and Urban Development funded the publication of <br /> <br />an Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual for use by local engineers and <br /> <br />designers in design and analysis of drainage structures. Some of the <br /> <br />data in the manual was used in the Broomfield drainage analysis. Peak <br /> <br />discharges were determined utilizing a synthetic unit hydrograph and <br /> <br />local rainfall records. These peaks were adjusted and (or) checked <br /> <br />by other rational methods before final acceptance and a graph of <br /> <br />drainage area versus peak discharge was plotted for each area. <br /> <br />Twenty-three cross sections were surveyed within the study area. <br /> <br />Water-surface profiles were determined using the U.S. Geological Survey <br /> <br />step-backwater program along with hand computations for flow-over-the-road <br /> <br />and culvert analysis. Although velocities were calculated to be at or <br /> <br />near supercritical in a few of the cross sections, profiles are <br /> <br />representative of the channel and are believed to be satisfactory for <br /> <br />flood insurance purposes. However, due to the steep slopes and high <br /> <br />velocities that would be encountered in a floodway analysis, results <br /> <br />would be unreliable and therefore that analysis is not practical. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.