My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04820
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:04:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Evaluation and Implementation of Urban Drainage and Flood Control Projects Completion Report
Date
6/1/1974
Prepared By
CSU Environmental Resources Center,
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />quantified although empirical data is badly needed. Other benefits <br />should be included in the economic analysis of DOPC projects (see <br />Table II-I) and techniques for doing this are being developed. <br />Reduction in average annual flood damage is one of the goals of <br />DOPC. However, the damage reduction benefit should be regarded as <br />important to the extent that the damage reduction goal is important, <br />but not more. An important consideration is that damage reduction <br />primarily benefits the few property owners in the flood plain, If <br />the DOFC project is funded from general taxes, income will be trans- <br />ferred from the taxpayers to flood plain occupants, creating incentive <br />to occupy the flood plain. <br />It is suspected that damage reduction has been given priority <br />in evaluation of DOFC projects because of its visibility. Nevertheless, <br />the accuracy with which potential damages can be estimated is dependent <br />on the availability of reliable depth-damage relationships which are <br /> <br /> <br />only in an early stage of development [5]. <br /> <br /> <br />Economic analysis of major DOFC projects should proceed as <br /> <br /> <br />outlined by James and Lee [9] or by Rice [13]. The latter is to be <br /> <br /> <br />preferred because he presents detailed data and estimating curves for <br /> <br /> <br />direct use. The results of the analysis should be used with perspective, <br /> <br /> <br />however, considering first the DOFC objectives and then letting tangible, <br /> <br /> <br />quantifiable benefits take their proper place in the decisionmaking <br /> <br /> <br />sequence. <br /> <br />Evaluation of Minor DOFC Projects <br />The problem of evaluating minor DOFC projects is not currently one <br />which can usually be solved using benefit-cost analysis. Referring to <br />Figure 11-4, it was shown that the prinicpal benefits for minor DOFC <br /> <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.